[2020] NZEmpC 158 FVB v XEY [pdf, 151 KB]
...[5] Given the proximity of the hearing, the parties were invited to respond to the application by 4 pm on 30 September 2020. [6] The plaintiff does not oppose the intervener’s application for leave and considers it is in the interests of justice that leave be granted, essentially because the evidence in question relates more directly to the intervener than it does to the plaintiff. [7] The defendant has not responded. Leave to cross-examine granted [8] Section...