Search Results

1. Tucker & Ors as Trustees of the Ngahere Trust v Tucker [pdf, 256 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00540 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN GRAEME TUCKER and GLENYS TUCKER and STEPHEN SUDBURY as trustees of the Ngahere Trust Claimants AND ALLAN TUCKER First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 13, 14 & 15 December 2004 Appearances: John Ross, counsel for the Claimants David Grindle, counsel for the First Respondent Roger Bowden, counsel for th

2. [2011] NZEmpC 100 Liu v South Pacific Timber (1990) Ltd [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...Costley v Waimea Nurseries Ltd [2011] NZEmpC 59. the effect on the rights and liabilities on the parties; subsequent events; and the merits. [5] This list is not exhaustive and the overriding consideration will always be the interests of justice in the particular case. No one factor is necessarily any more important than another. In this case the intended defendant concedes, responsibly, that the application for leave will turn largely on the merits of the intended challe...

3. [2011] NZEmpC 116 Pollett v Browns Real Estate Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...liabilities of the parties; subsequent events; and the merits of the intended challenge. [4] No one factor is necessarily any more important than another. The list is not exhaustive and the overriding consideration will always be the interests of justice in a particular case. [5] The intended defendant’s grounds of opposition include: that the justice of the case does not require an extension of time; that the intending plaintiff’s delay is 28 days; that the intend...

4. ENVC paper Preparing for an Environment Court hearing 2014 [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...practitioners led a “road-show” around New Zealand specifically on this topic. The road-show took the form of a workshop conducted in 8 regional centres around the country. At its conclusion I prepared a paper describing the topics covered and the many matters discussed and learned by all participants including ourselves. [2] I recommend that registrants to the current conference read that paper, rather than I should repeat its contents here. It is called Report of Steering Group f...

5. MOJ0501 Childrens Guide to Separation booklet [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...grandparents and cousins, aunts and uncles too. Let your parents know. Tell them how Will I still see everyone? If you don’t feel safe with one of your parents, you can be protected from them. It’s your right to be safe all the time, no matter who’s looking after you. If you’re worried about your safety, tell an adult you trust. You can also call the phone numbers listed at the back of this booklet. you feel about seeing all the family. Keep seeing your friends too �...

6. 2025 NZPSPLA 123 pdf [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...statement on his website, until it was removed during the course of this investigation, was: To give you complete confidence, John is licensed as a security consultant by the Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority through the Ministry of Justice. This means John has been deemed to have the appropriate skills to conduct work in the private security sector. [19] The statement was untrue and misleading to his clients. [20] Investigator Ingleton also notes that Mr McGrevy a...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 219 D’Arcy- Smith v Natural Habitats Ltd [pdf, 100 KB]

   GRAHAM D'ARCY-SMITH v NATURAL HABITATS LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 219 [27 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 219 ARC 57/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for rehearing AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to objection to disclosure of documents BETWEEN GRAHAM D'ARCY-SMITH Plaintiff AND...

8. Nicholls v Nicholls - Part Papaaroha 6B Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 64 (2011 APPEAL 64) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...Respondents were simply 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 68 pursuing their rightful legal remedies to rectify a situation of the Appellants own making. (g) the behaviour of the Appellants in taking control of parts of the land went to the overall justice of the matter which put the lands at financial risk; and (h) the appeal is another attempt to rehash old issues. It does not establish the foundations for or set out a solid basis as to an error of law on the Judge’s part....

9. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Ms A [2022] NZLCDT 51 (22 December 2022) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT’S NAME AND EMPLOYER NAME MADE PERMANENT ON 27 APRIL 2023. ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 OF THE LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZLCDT 51 LCDT 006/22 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND Ms A Respondent CHAIR Dr J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K King Ms N McMahon Ms M Noble...

10. BORA Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill [pdf, 419 KB]

    ...complete the proportionality analysis it is necessary to determine whether, under the Bill, the maintenance of proportionality is an absolute value, or whether the reasons that give rise to the member's difficulty with his/her party could as a matter of law be relevant to the legislation's operation. To answer this question, it is necessary to consider the Supreme Court's judgments in Awatere Huata. Whether Maintenance of Party Proportionality is an Absolute Value 32. As...