Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8027 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZEmpC 38 Goleman Wellington Cleaning Ltd v Nicolle [pdf, 323 KB]

    ...GOLEMAN WELLINGTON CLEANING LIMITED v MICHAEL NICOLLE [2020] NZEmpC 38 [6 April 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 38 EMPC 33/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN GOLEMAN WELLINGTON CLEANING LIMITED Plaintiff AND MICHAEL NICOLLE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearanc...

  2. FD v WJ Ltd & LD Ltd [2015] NZDT 1465 (10 December 2015) [pdf, 147 KB]

    ...was based on the Fair Trading Act 1986, whereas his present claim is based on the CGA. However, the issues raised are essentially the same or at least similar, and FD could have raised the CGA in the MVDT proceedings. It is undesirable for the same matter to be litigated more than once if the parties have had a fair opportunity to put their case. Therefore, even if I technically have jurisdiction to hear FD’s claim against LD, which I doubt, I find it appropriate to dismiss the claim on...

  3. [2021] NZACC 8 - Stryder v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...who fuckin’ lie.” [26] He said he believed that Dale O’Connor (ACC employee) wrote up Dr Maginness’ report and signed it on her behalf because it is on an ACC 266 report form. He then said: “The ACC system is fucked. Where is the justice in this world?” Decision [27] Section 117 of the Accident Compensation Act provides that the Corporation may suspend entitlements. Subsection (3) states: For as long as the claimant unreasonably refuses or unreasonably fails to ...

  4. Maori-Land-Trusts.pdf [pdf, 341 KB]

    Te Kooti Whenua Māori – Māori Land Court (MLC) is the New Zealand Court that hears matters relating to Māori land. The unique relationship between Māori and whenua is recognised by the MLC, and the records held by the Court form an invaluable part of the whakapapa of all Māori people. The MLC operates under the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. The MLC deals with applications for new trusts, replacement trustees, variations to trusts, reviews of trusts and formal co

  5. KT & others v ON & UN [2019] NZDT 1564 (6 March 2019) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...SECOND RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. LQ is to pay ON $425.00 on or before 20 March 2019. Reasons: 1. LQ, OT, and XT and KT brought a claim against their neighbours ON and UN. The claim relates to a number of matters between the parties including boundary fencing, garden plantings and damage to property. LQ claims $1625.00. 2. The claim between XT and KT, and ON and UN has been resolved by agreement. 3. The claim between OT, and ON and UN has be...

  6. MOJ0217.1E_OCT21_WEB.pdf [pdf, 343 KB]

    Te Kooti Whenua Māori – Māori Land Court (MLC) is the New Zealand Court that hears matters relating to Māori land. The unique relationship between Māori and whenua is recognised by the MLC, and the records held by the Court form an invaluable part of the whakapapa of all Māori people. The MLC operates under the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. The MLC deals with applications for new trusts, replacement trustees, variations to trusts, reviews of trusts and formal co

  7. B Ltd v C Ltd & others [2024] NZDT 99 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...of the removal of C Ltd from the Register of Companies? c. Is XD personally liable for any damages payable by C Ltd? d. Is LD personally liable for any damages payable by C Ltd? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 11 5. As a preliminary matter I note that during the second hearing of this claim before me, XD suggested that he (and presumably also LD) should not have been joined as parties in this claim in their personal capacity, because section 13 of the Legislation Act 2019 me...

  8. 2025 NZPSPLA 040 pdf [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...The decision is of limited public interest. 7 c) After taking into account the presumption in favour of publication the Licensing Authority considers the decision should not be published because it would be contrary to the interest of justice. [32] None of the above apply to this decision. There is a public interest in this decision being released and it is not contrary to the interest of justice for it to be published. Accordingly, no suppression orders are made in res...

  9. [2009] NZEmpC AC 32/09 LAL (Trading as Glomax Super Tailors) v Yeleswaram [pdf, 20 KB]

    ...but delegated a number of its functions to others who could give relevant evidence. [11] Although the order for stay of execution of the Authority’s determination was made unconditionally and without opposition by the inspector, I consider that justice to both parties can best be achieved by allowing the application for adjournment but to a specified date and on condition that the plaintiff gives security for some of the amounts directed to be paid by him under the Authority’s d...

  10. BORA Ngati Porou Claims Settlement Bill [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney- General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omission...