8033 items matching your search terms
...REUNITED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED v NELMAC LIMITED [2023] NZEmpC 74 [16 May 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2023] NZEmpC 74 EMPC 468/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN REUNITED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND NELMAC LIMITED Defendant EMPC 137/2022 AND IN THE MA...
...authorities need to be considered with some degree of caution, in Framus Ltd v CRH plc, 5 the Supreme Court of Ireland was called upon to consider the requirement that documents sought on discovery must be relevant, directly or indirectly, to the matters in issue between the parties in the proceedings. In doing so, the Supreme Court endorsed the following statements of principle: (1) The Court must decide as a matter of probability as to whether any particular document is relev...
...brought and defended the proceeding, and whether steps taken in it were reasonable. For example, a governmental or third party decision may have intervened, rendering the proceeding redundant. But this is merely to recognise that the interests of justice occasionally may require that such matters be taken into account. It is not to invite a general inquiry into the reasonableness of the parties’ conduct. [23] Third, and consistent with what we have just said, a plaintiff may no...
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZLCDT 16 LCDT 020/20 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 2 Applicant AND DEBBIE LAURA PAULSON WILSON Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K King Ms S Sage Ms S Stuart Ms P Walker HEARING HELD AT Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Auckland DATE OF HEARING 27 April...
...trustees) requested that the beneficial owners of the Trust be provided with an opportunity to consider and discuss the easement. Judicial conferences were held on 18 May 2022, 16 June 2022 and 26 July 2022 to discuss this matter (among other residual matters arising out of my 22 December 2021 decision).2 To bring this matter to a head, I called for submissions from the parties by 14 July 2022 on whether the beneficial owners are required to be provided with an opportunity to cons...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 27 READT 021/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN MICHAEL HENRY HARVEY Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2001) First Respondent AND RICHARD LOWE and PETRONELLA LOWE Second Respondents Hearing: 9 April 2021, at Nelson (further submissions filed after the hearing) Tri...
...Practitioner’s refusal to refund any part of the fee that had been paid by the Applicants when the Practitioner represented them in relation to certain criminal charges. [3] The Applicants had paid the Practitioner the agreed sum of $10,000. Matters did not eventuate as originally planned or envisaged and the Applicants then briefed another lawyer, and sought a refund of part of the payment made to the Practitioner. Background [4] The Applicants are a mother and daughter who...
STEPHEN ROACH v NAZARETH CARE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 165 [21 December 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 165 EMPC 169/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN STEPHEN ROACH Plaintiff AND NAZARETH CARE CHARITABLE TRUST BOARD Defendant Hearing: 13 November 2017 Appearances: J Goldstein, counsel for the plaintiff...
Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000119 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 26 BETWEEN HAI CAO and YANMING TAO Claimants AND TONY TAY AND ASSOCIATES LIMITED (In Liquidation) First Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND BRIAN WILLIAM NEWTH Third Respondent AND ALLAN CHRISTINI (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND TONY MENG HIANG TAY Fifth Respondent AND SELINA SIAW NYUNAK TAY Sixth Respondent AND JOHN WATTS TRAD
[2012] NZACA 5 ACA 16/08 & ACA 281/88 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN MR B of Auckland Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY Robyn Bedford HEARING at Auckland on 9 December 2011 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL...