Search Results

1. People remanded and offending on bail December 2023 [xlsx, 104 KB]

   ...hold the person in custody if it is satisfied that there is an unacceptable risk that the person may: - fail to turn up to court on their next court date - interfere with witnesses or evidence - offend while on bail. The court must also consider any matter that would make it unjust to detain the person. For more information refer to the Bail Act 2000: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2000/0038/latest/whole.html Bail Remand on bail is release from court or police custody under specif...

2. People remanded and offending on bail June 2023 [xlsx, 103 KB]

   ...hold the person in custody if it is satisfied that there is an unacceptable risk that the person may: - fail to turn up to court on their next court date - interfere with witnesses or evidence - offend while on bail. The court must also consider any matter that would make it unjust to detain the person. For more information refer to the Bail Act 2000: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2000/0038/latest/whole.html Bail Remand on bail is release from court or police custody under specif...

3. People remanded and offending on bail jun2024 [xlsx, 104 KB]

   ...hold the person in custody if it is satisfied that there is an unacceptable risk that the person may: - fail to turn up to court on their next court date - interfere with witnesses or evidence - offend while on bail. The court must also consider any matter that would make it unjust to detain the person. For more information refer to the Bail Act 2000: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2000/0038/latest/whole.html Bail Remand on bail is release from court or police custody under specif...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 3 Northland DHB and 20 Others v New Zealand Resident Doctors Association Inc [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...exercised in cases of minor technical informality does not mean that s 219 should be interpreted as applicable only to such cases. It is a broad discretionary power and the Court must look at all of the interests of the respective parties and of justice to determine whether it should be exercised. [71] Finally, the plaintiffs say that despite having drawn the issue to the Union’s attention on 19 November 2009, the defendant did not respond and it was only eight days after that ad...

5. Programme evaluation of Target Hardening pilot [pdf, 673 KB]

   Evaluation of the Target Hardening Pilot Programme Cathy Casey, Bhavani PaulRaj and Susie Jacka Institute of Public Policy Auckland University of Technology with Tanya Segessenmann Ministry of Justice ii First published in April 2004 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN...

6. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Mr K [2024] NZLCDT 18 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...NAMES OF THE RESPONDENT PRACTITIONER’S WIFE AND CHILD. THESE ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 18 LCDT 010/23 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND Mr K Respondent DEPUTY CHAIR Dr J G Adams MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Hon P Heath KC Ms G Phipps Prof D Sco...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 45 Miller v Fonterra Co-op Group Ltd [pdf, 38 KB]

   MILLER V FONTERRA CO-OP GROUP LTD AK 27 April 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 45 ARC 45/09 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF preliminary issues BETWEEN SEAN MILLER Plaintiff AND FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 March 2010 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Tony Drake, counsel for plaintiff John Rooney and Katherine Burson, counsel for defendant...

8. IG v HC LCRO 101/12 (3 June 2015) [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...to obtain her entitlement. 2 [3] Ms IG says when she first instructed Mr HC she was intent on commencing court proceedings, but that he prevailed on her to continue negotiating, and she was dissatisfied when several months later, the matter was not resolved and she was forced to commence court proceedings in England. Ms IG says Mr HC should have told her from the beginning that he could not advise her on English law, or act in court proceedings commenced in England. She...

9. Deputy Registrar - Estate of Hohepa Ripia [2016] Chief Judge's MB 869 (2016 CJ 869) [pdf, 273 KB]

   2016 Chief Judge’s MB 869 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20110007018 CJ 2011/29 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hohepa Ripia (Deceased) DEPUTY REGISTRAR Applicant Judgment: 20 October 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 870 Introduction [1] This application filed by a Deputy Reg...

10. BORA Food Bill [pdf, 152 KB]

    ...buyer. We have considered whether cl 211 limits the freedom of expression affirmed in s 14 of the Bill of Rights Act. We conclude that any limitation can be justified because cl 211 serves an important and significant objective and is restricted to matters contained in the Bill. It does not prevent a person from advertising or expressing genuinely held opinions. 5. Clause 256 of the Bill empowers the chief executive of the department responsible for administering the Act (‘the chie...