Search Results

1. Criminal Procedure Act

   The Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (the Act) includes 5 stages: Admin Review Trial Sentencing Appeal Admin The main components of this stage are: proceedings commence with the filing of a charging document the defendant makes his or her first appearances proceedings for category 4 offences transfer to the High Court pleas and elections are entered. Part 2 of the Act sets out the commencement of proceedings and preliminary steps, with 2 subparts: filing a charging document notifying defendant o

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers

2. Criminal Procedure Act

   The Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (the Act) includes 5 stages: Admin Review Trial Sentencing Appeal Admin The main components of this stage are: proceedings commence with the filing of a charging document the defendant makes his or her first appearances proceedings for category 4 offences transfer to the High Court pleas and elections are entered. Part 2 of the Act sets out the commencement of proceedings and preliminary steps, with 2 subparts: filing a charging document notifying defendant o

   Located in:

   1. Coroners Court >
   2. About >
   3. Lawyers & service providers

3. CEIT Chair's practice notes [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...inquisitorial, enabling it to investigate the claim in a non- confrontational way • subject to the principles of natural justice to ensure that its processes are fair and transparent. From the outset, the parties will be encouraged to work together on matters that are agreed. The Tribunal is governed by the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 (“the Act”). These Practice Notes have been prepared by the Chair in accordance with clause 2 of the First Schedule to the A...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 116 Te Runanga O Ngati Awa v Whakatane District Council [pdf, 952 KB]

   ...Runanga o Ngati Awa (TRONA) appealed the regional consents. Sustainable Otakiri Incorporated (Sustainable Otakiri) appealed both the district and regional consents and filed an application for declarations from the Court in relation to jurisdictional matters. Sustainable Otakiri subsequently withdrew their RM17-0424-Wf.01 2 RM17-424- LC.01 3 RM17-0424-DC.02 and RM17-424-DC.03 4 RM17-0424-DC.01 5 Consent ref. 61/ 4/817 4 appeals against the regional consents. [7] Te Runanga o...

5. [2025] NZEmpC 64 Sharma v Rodney Farm 'N' Machinery Ltd [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...Sharma v Rodney Farm ‘N’ Machinery Ltd [2023] NZERA 765. [2] The challenge is de novo but, although the Authority dealt with a large number of issues, the parties agreed that, for the purposes of the Court proceeding, there were five matters in dispute: (i) whether a penalty should be ordered against Rodney Farm ‘N’ Machinery Ltd in respect of deductions wrongly taken from Mr Sharma’s pay; (ii) whether Mr Sharma was subject to an unjustifiable disadvantage beca...

6. Proactive-release-of-political-donations-consultation-materials-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 12 MB]

   Proa cti ve R ele as e Ministry of Justice Proactive release of material related to submissions on proposed changes to political donation rules Date of issue: 20 January 2023 Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it.

7. Taueki - Horowhenua X1B41 North A3A and 3B1 (2008) 16 Aotea Appellate MB 30 (16 WGAP 30) [pdf, 10 MB]

   16 Whanganui Appellate Court MS 30 IN TaE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20070012538 IN THE MATTER of an appeal by VIVIENNE TAUEKI pursuant,to Section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 against a decision of the Maori Land Court made pursuant to Section 151/93on 8 October 2007 at 193 Aotea 232- 249 confirming an application for alienation being a sale of the land known as Horowhenua XIB 41 North A3A and 3Bl Hearing: 5 December 2007 (Heard at Whanganui) Coram: Judge G...

8. LCRO 68/2018 TY v HG (29 November 2019) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...2 [ENT] had been engaged to provide EEE and its client with economic advice and assistance. 3 Section 103(2) is an offence provision that reads: “No person shall attempt to deceive or knowingly mislead the Commission in relation to any matter before it.” 4 “having referred to ‘the offence under s103 of the Act where a person attempts to deceive or knowingly mislead the Commission in relation to any matter before it’, [Mr HG’s statement states] that ‘requirin...

9. J v A LCRO 31/2009 (30 April 2009) [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...controlled). The bills in question were both dated 30 June 2008. The first was billed to company AAAA in the sum of $18 007.65. The second was billed to Partnership BBBB in the sum of $5 519.00. [2] The Manawatu Standards Committee referred the matter to Mr X who it appointed as a costs assessor on 17 October 2008. Mr X formed a preliminary view which he expressed in a letter of 9 January. It appears that the preliminary report was provided to Lawyer A (on 16 January) through his c...

10. LCRO 165/2019 RG v TQ (19 May 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]

    ...engagement in December 2017; and (c) the firm’s three-pronged approach to addressing complaints when raised had been followed, and (d) Ms TQ had initially raised her concerns with him, and he had spent considerable time endeavouring to resolve matters; and [17] When Ms TQ’s concerns had been referred to Mr RG, Mr RG had considered Ms TQ’s complaints and responded to Ms TQ. [18] Ms TQ instructed counsel to assist her in advancing her complaint. Her lawyer filed submissio...