Search Results

1. Ashworth v Kent (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 55 [pdf, 475 KB]

   ...whom that section applies, has not referred the person to the Director of Proceedings under section 45(2)(f); or (b) the Director of Proceedings declines or fails to take proceedings. [13] The limitation on the right to bring proceedings where the matter has been resolved by agreement between the parties has no application on the facts but is referred to for completeness. The ACC bar and the claim for exemplary damages [14] Section 52(2) of the HDCA explicitly prohibits the award...

2. FT Ltd v D Ltd [2020] NZDT 1418 (27 November 2020) [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

3. Mauve v Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...desirable to do so. [71] To determine whether it is desirable to do so, the Tribunal must consider whether there is material before the Tribunal to show specific adverse consequences sufficient to justify an exception to the fundamental rule of open justice.25 The Tribunal must also consider whether an order is reasonably necessary to secure the “proper administration of justice” in proceedings before it and ensure it does no more than is necessary to achieve that.26 [72]...

4. Sentencing in New Zealand: A statistical analysis [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Sentencing in New Zealand: a statistical analysis Sue Triggs Ministry of Justice 2 First published in June 1999 by the Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISBN 0-478-20142-7 3 Foreword The Ministry undertakes research and evaluation on sentencing, so that future policy decisions can be underpinned by relevant information. The research presented in this report examines for the first time the combined effects of a wide range of statistica

5. NZCASS Data tables 2 reporting crime [xlsx, 809 KB]

   ...response. 16a Victim satisfaction with Police response – sampling error How variable are the statistics in table 16? Enquiries Contact us for further information about these and related statistics. Copyright © New Zealand Ministry of Justice, Tāhū o te Ture This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand licence. You are free to copy, distribute, and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Ministry of Justice and follow any oth...

6. Smallman - Te Rangi Kaiamokura [2015] Chief Judge's MB 188 (2015 CJ 188) [pdf, 340 KB]

   2015 Chief Judgeꞌs MB 188 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20090017831 CJ 2009/48 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Rangi Kaiamokura BETWEEN TUTEA SMALLMAN Applicant Judgment: 19 March 2015 DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 2015 Chief Judgeꞌs MB 189 Introduction [1] This application filed by Tuatea Smallman (the...

7. 2017 NZSSAA 050 (4 September 2017) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...12M to prevent the Chief Executive from then asking the Authority to consider any matter which may support the decision which is under appeal. Indeed, the thrust of the section is quite the other way: that the Authority is to consider all relevant matters. 1 Margison v Chief Executive of the Department of Work and Income HC Auckland AP.141-SW00, 6 August 2001 at [27]. 2 Arbuthnot v Chief Executive of the Department of Work and Income [20...

8. SW v UH LCRO 170/2014 (5 February 2016) [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...him were unfounded. [23] It is not the role of this office to make findings on contested issues that have been put to the Court in affidavit evidence. [24] If Mr SW rejects suggestion that he is asking this office to make evidential findings on matters that are dealt with within the shroud of confidentiality provided by the Family Court, he need do no more than refer to paragraphs 15 and 16 of his 15 July submissions to the LCRO, in which he specifically invites the LCRO to consider af...

9. [2017] NZEmpC 61 Ahuja v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...KHOOBSURAT LIMITED) (IN LIQUIDAITON) v NAARI COLLECTION LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND NEELAM AHUJA AND CHIRAG AHUJA NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 61 [18 May 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 61 EMPC 331/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out plaintiffs' proceedings AND IN THE MATTER of an application for stay BETWEE...

10. Liu v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) & Parore [2018] NZREADT 7 [pdf, 244 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 7 READT 032/17 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN XUESEN LIU Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 409) First Respondent AND MAXWELL (RIC) PARORE Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms N Dangen, Member Mr N O’Connor, Member Submissi...