Search Results

1. [2006] NZEmpC AC 58/06 McLean v Buy West Reality Ltd [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...administration of the branch was handled by the receptionist. She was the only one with access to the branch computer, the stationery cupboard, and the petty cash. She received all incoming money and dealt directly with head office at Te Atatu on those matters without reference to Mr McLean. [23] Mr McLean would help sales staff with their weekly advertising in real estate magazines. The form of the ads was determined by head office branch at Te Atatu. [24] Salesperson...

2. Wall v The Maori Land Court - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust and Tauhara Middle 4A2A Trust [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 55 (2010 APPEAL 55) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CHARLES TE REOWHAKAKOTAHI WALL MAC A20090002091 29 March 2010 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT 2010 MAORI APPELLATE COURT MB 55 A20090002091 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Appeals pursuant to section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 against a decision of the Māori Land Court dated 18 December 2008 in respect of TAUHARA MIDDLE 15 TRUST and TAUHARA MIDDLE 4A2A (MOUNTAIN RESERVATION) TRUST BETWE...

3. National Standards Committee v Young [2017] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 315 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2017] NZLCDT 41 LCDT 026/17 UNDER The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 IN THE MATTER Of Disciplinary Proceedings under Part 7 of the Act BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND JINYUE (PAUL) YOUNG Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS Ms F Freeman Ms C Rowe Ms S Sage Mr I Williams HEARING 20 & 21 November 2017 HELD AT Auckland...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - East Coast Settlement Report [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...those identifying as Ruawaipu, Uepohatu, and te Aitanga-a-Hauiti are ngāti Porou. The Crown has sub- mitted that TRONP has a valid mandate to negotiate all ngati Porou historical claims within the east Coast inquiry district. We did not inquire into matters of tribal identity, but instead focused on the actions of the Crown in recognising TRONP’s mandate. Having assessed the evidence and arguments of all parties, we have not recom- mended that the Crown delay settlement with TRONP as req...

5. Matauri Bay Properties Ltd v Proprietors of Matauri X Incorporation - Lot 1 DP 451540 and 71 (2015) 117 Taitokerau MB 39 (117 TTK 39) [pdf, 603 KB]

   117 Taitokerau MB 39 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20150004779 UNDER Sections 151, 152 and 158 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Lot 1 DP 451540 & 71 other Lots (Formerly Lot 191 DP 393664 of Matauri X) and Lot 192 DP 393664 – Confirmation of Alienation BETWEEN MATAURI BAY PROPERTIES LIMITED (in receivership and liquidation) and STRATEGIC NOMINEES LIMITED (in receivership) Applicants AND PROPRE...

6. DL v WR & WQ LCRO 39 / 2011 (29 September 2011) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...there were legal and factual disputes necessitating representation by a solicitor with greater experience than Mr WQ. Mr WR was unavailable to assist and consequently Mr WO was instructed. [12] Submissions were prepared and sent to Mr WO. The matter was set down for a defended summary judgement hearing on 22 January 2010. [13] On the day of the hearing Mr WQ attended the Court together with Mr DL and Mr WO. Prior to the hearing, Mr WO and Mr WQ met with the landlord‟s counsel...

7. C Ltd v J Inc [2024] NZDT 105 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...street level, and there was a problem with drainage from the street in heavy rain, which meant that water came down the outside stairs that accessed the restaurant, and into the restaurant. 56. C Ltd accepts that this happened and says it was due to matters outside its control – which was the drainage on street level. C Ltd says it has worked closely with [City] Council to get the street level drainage problems addressed. At one point there was a proposal that [Council] would reorien...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 89 Ngawharau v The Porirua Whanau Centre Trust [pdf, 251 KB]

   IRITANA HOROWAI NGAWHARAU v THE PORIRUA WHANAU CENTRE TRUST NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 89 [12 June 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2015] NZEmpC 89 WRC 14/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN IRITANA HOROWAI NGAWHARAU Plaintiff AND THE PORIRUA WHANAU CENTRE TRUST Defendant Hearing: 24 February and 8 May 2015 (heard at Wellington) Appearances:...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 152 The Salad Bowl Ltd v Howe-Thornley [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...good faith by the plaintiff. So, for example, pursuant to s 4(4)(bb), the duty of good faith applied to “any matter arising under or in relation to an individual employment agreement while the agreement is in force”. Pursuant to s 4(5) the matters specified in subs (4) (of which (bb) is one) are non-exhaustive examples of the circumstances in which the duty of good faith applies. [82] Examples of the duty of good faith in practice are set out in s 4(1A) and include a requireme...

10. National Standards Committee 1 v Peters [2019] NZLCDT 39 [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...within the Courtroom and able to directly report would make their material available more widely. [13] Later His Honour commented: “I think it’s important to note also that reporting that’s not fair, accurate and balanced and that contains matters published out of context or beyond the purvey (sic) of what takes place here can risk imperilling the trial itself. This is an important point to bear in mind.”6 [14] Mr Peters had seen the accused for approximately a further fiv...