8470 items matching your search terms
[2015] NZSSAA 007 Reference No. SSA 123/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member HEARING at AUCKLAND on 11 December 2014 APPEARANCES Mr M Darke, Advocate for the appellant Ms R Shaw, for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development DEC...
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2014] NZIACDT 101 Reference No: IACDT 29/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Lavinia Tuumotooa and Paulo Tuumotooa Complainants AND Alungamonu (Laki) Tangilanu (Monu) Adviser DECISION IMPOSITION OF SAN...
LYTTELTON PORT COMPANY LIMITED v THE RAIL AND MARITIME TRANSPORT UNION INC NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 1 [6 January 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 1 EMPC 346/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for amended orders AND IN THE MATTER of an application for interim injunction BETWEEN LYTTELTON PORT COMPANY LIMITED Plaintiff AND THE RAIL AND MARITIME TRANSPORT UNION INC First Defendant AND MARIT...
...56 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20210006142 WĀHANGA Under Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Kata or Wairewa 2534 and other blocks I WAENGA I A Between NERI HOTUROA TOMLINS Te Kaitono Applicant CHARLES LESLIE BELLAMY Te Kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 2 June 2021 (H...
...ANY OTHER DETAILS WHICH MIGHT LEAD TO HIS IDENTIFICATION. THIS ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2025] NZLCDT 26 LCDT 008/24 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND GAUTAM JINDAL Practitioner CHAIR Ms D Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms K King Ms G Phipps Ms S Stuart...
WHANAU TAHI LTD v KIRAN DASARI NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 120 [20 September 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 120 EMPC 326/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WHANAU TAHI LTD Plaintiff AND KIRAN DASARI Defendant Hearing: 19 November 2015, 18 May 2016, closing submissions filed on 15 and 28 June 2016 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: M...
...incompetent”. [28] Mr Simpson referred us to the relevant High Court authorities as to the tests for determining whether conduct constitutes misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct. In Complaints Assessment Committee 20003 v Zhagroo, her Honour Justice Thomas said regarding s 73(b):2 The words of s 73(b) must be given their plain meaning. Whether serious negligence or serious incompetence has occurred is a question to be answered in the circumstances of each case … the Tribunal...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 74 READT 019/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN M D COTTLE FAMILY TRUST and McBRIDE STREET CARS LTD Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND TIMOTHY BARNETT of Dunedin, Real Estate Agent Second respondent READT 020/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agen...
...230 Introduction [1] In my reserved judgment of 4 July 2014 I declined to grant an injunction against Manuka Pere but granted leave to Wayne Peters, counsel for the applicant, Putataua Bay Holdings Limited (“PBH”), to address the two matters requiring clarification noted in my judgment and to seek a further hearing. 1 [2] Mr Peters filed a memorandum dated 14 July 2014 addressing the matters raised in my reserved judgment. On 25 July 2014 I directed a further hearing...
...DL says that Ms RS controlled the pleadings, and, essentially contends that he was no more than a mouthpiece. He says Ms RS relied on Mr MP to amend the pleadings, and to comply with the court timetable. Mr DL says he limited his retainer to matters for which he was practically able to take responsibility. 3 [11] Mr DL says it is not correct for the Committee to have recorded that he conducted proceedings for Mr MP, when Ms RS was instructing solicitor. He says he did not k...