8039 items matching your search terms
...recognised as a refugee or a protected person, whose recognition has been cancelled under section 146) 4 March 2025 PRACTICE NOTE 3/2025 (DEPORTATION – RESIDENT) PREAMBLE 1. COMMENCEMENT PRELIMINARY MATTERS 2. JURISDICTION 3. NOTICE OF APPEAL 4. REPRESENTATION 5. CONTACT ADDRESS 6. FAMILY APPEALS AND CHILDREN 7. NEEDS OF APPELLANTS 8. VICTIMS’ SUBMISSIONS 9. OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT AND PRIVACY ACT REQUESTS 10. ORDER OF...
...regard Ms TR has felt compelled to make this complaint 2 out of a sense of responsibility to Mr YV’s client (Ms OP) who she does not consider has been well served by Mr YV. Background [4] The Committee summarised the background to this matter in the following way:1 VP (“VP”) died in [Country] in [Year]. At the time of his death VP was married to HP (“HP”). OP was VP’s only child and the product of an earlier relationship. VP did not leave a will and his estate (...
...those years ago and which I continue to do today. Monty regarded becoming a mem- ber of the Tribunal as another honour, especially since it happened at a com- paratively young age. He says his time at the Tribunal has ‘opened my eyes to the injustices Māori have faced in this country and to how poorly we teach about this.’ We congratulate Monty on receiv- ing his prestigious award. Dr Monty Soutar ONZM 4 Tania Simpson ONZM On 30 December 2023, Tribunal mem- ber Tania Simpson (...
LET’S TALK COURT A young person’s guide to being a witness 2 | LET’S TALK COURT For young people aged 13 to 17 years The contents of this publication are true and accurate to the best knowledge of the author and the Ministry of Justice as at October 2019. However no liability is assumed by the author or the Ministry of Justice for any losses suffered by any person relying directly or indirectly on this publication. Note: Some of the information in this book may seem more releva
...the defects in the dwelling for which it is alleged each party is liable. Include the amount being sought against each party. 1.6 Responses should not just contain bare admissions, denials or refusals to admit but: Set out which matters in the claim are accepted or agreed Set out the material facts relied upon Include details of any affirmative defences Include any set-off, claim for apportionment or cross claim 2. Filing Applications for Adjudication...
...clear cost/benefit advice throughout the course of the litigation, is of practical importance and is consistent with the underlying objectives of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). Not all litigation is susceptible to settlement. Some matters require judicial intervention and decision. In such cases the Court is greatly assisted by high standards of advocacy, focussing on the resolution of the key issues in dispute. The Court is not assisted by representatives who obf...
...the defects in the dwelling for which it is alleged each party is liable. Include the amount being sought against each party. 1.6 Responses should not just contain bare admissions, denials or refusals to admit but: Set out which matters in the claim are accepted or agreed Set out the material facts relied upon Include details of any affirmative defences Include any set-off, claim for apportionment or cross claim 2. Filing Applications for Adjudication...
Q v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 [7 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 CRC 8/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN Q Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: (26-30 January, 2-5 and 12-13 February 2015) (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: A Shaw, J Behrnes and M Dutkiewicz, co
...facts concerning the merits of the claim disputed by the defendants were sufficient to establish an arguable defence. As a result, the Tribunal set aside its decision because it was satisfied that there was, or may have been, a miscarriage of justice. [5] The matter was reheard by a differently constituted Tribunal on 4, 5 and 6 April 2016. The rehearing was defended. The Director of Human Rights Proceedings called the plaintiff; Satnam Singh, to give oral evidence. Kuljeet Si...
...note from materials provided by Mr NE2 [4] Mr NE says he dealt mostly with Ms RL. He is critical of her interpersonal skills, says she did not act in his best interests, did not communicate well and lacked the necessary expertise to handle his matter. He says she appeared to be unprepared at meetings, had not come to grips with the evidence and handled discovery incompetently. He says she failed to review the contents of a CD he had provided, and that the other party disclosed med...