Search Results

1. LCRO 233/2014 IB v KZ (27 June 2018) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...was inaccurate, but nevertheless arranged for Mrs RP to amend the post. That amendment removed reference to the allegation of dishonest conduct. [7] In telephone discussions with KZ’s lawyer, Mr IB advised that it was his intention, when the matter got to trial, to “destroy” Ms X. [8] In the course of correspondence between counsel concerning the circumstances of the Facebook post, Mr IB noted: It is legitimate for the RPs to endeavour to discredit [Ms X] and KZ. Similarly...

2. Appendix 2 Draft Annex to 23rd-24th Reports under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [pdf, 420 KB]

   ...Kaihautū: Māori co-leader Kaitiakitanga: Stewardship Kaiwhakatara: A respected senior practitioner role to support the reinvigoration of the entire family group conference process Kanohi ki te kanohi: Face-to-face Kaupapa: Topic, policy, matter for discussion, plan, purpose, scheme, proposal, agenda, subject, programme, theme, issue, initiative Kaumātua: Adult, elder, elderly man, elderly woman, old man - a person of status within the whānau Kawenata: Covenant, agreement or...

3. MLC 2017 04 National Panui [pdf, 298 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in APRIL | PAENGA-WHÄWHÄ 2017: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz APRIL | PAENGA-WHÄWHÄ 2017 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For mor

4. [2011] NZEmpC 152 Blackmore v Honick Properties Ltd [pdf, 178 KB]

   RICKY BLACKMORE V HONICK PROPERTIES LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 152 [24 November 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 152 ARC 37/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RICKY BLACKMORE Plaintiff AND HONICK PROPERTIES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 25 October 2011 (Heard at Hamilton) and by memoranda of submissions filed on 3 and 10 November 2011 Appearances: Gregor

5. BI v CW LCRO 23 / 2012 (12 September 2013) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...Mr BI was concerned at the finding of unsatisfactory conduct against him particularly as he had taken considerable steps to avoid a complaint about the fee. Before addressing the essence of his concerns it is pertinent to address some preliminary matters. The complaint [13] Ms CW complained about the quantum of Mr BI’s account. The account was rendered in January 2011, but related to legal services provided from April to December 2008. In carrying out his investigation, Mr CX n...

6. KV v LA LCRO 44/2015 (13 December 2016) [pdf, 122 KB]

   ...Z’s mother raised a jurisdictional issue relating to whether Mr KV could appeal interim orders. Counsel filed memoranda in April and Mr LA argued the jurisdictional point. Mr KV was kept informed and continued to press Z’s mother over the matters he wanted to change. [6] By the end of May 2013 Mr KV’s negotiations with Z’s mother had not progressed as he had hoped, and on 28 May the High Court heard the jurisdictional argument. Time was passing. Mr KV had spent money...

7. LCRO 236/2020 TB - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (13 December 2021) [pdf, 580 KB]

   ...was concerned about Mr TB’s behaviour, which it said involved encouraging summer clerks to take an afternoon off work, drinking with them throughout the afternoon and visiting an adult store with them. [29] Accordingly, [Law firm A] raised the matter with Mr TB by way of a formal employment investigation. [30] Mr TB provided his explanation for those events, saying that it was known he was taking the summer clerks out for lunch, and that there was nothing untoward about the afternoon...

8. Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: Consultation options for adoption law reform [pdf, 857 KB]

   Regulatory Impact Statement | 1 Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: Consultation options for adoption law reform Quality Assurance (completed by QA panel) Reviewing Agency/Agencies: Ministry of Justice Panel Assessment & Comment: The Ministry of Justice's RIA QA panel has reviewed the Interim Regulatory Impact Statement: Consultation options for adoption law reform (Interim RIS) prepared by the Ministry of Justice and considers that the information and a...

9. Auckland Standards Committee v Banbrook [2014] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 104 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZLCDT 37 LCDT 007/13 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 3 Applicant AND ANTHONY DAVID BANBROOK Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr S Maling Ms C Rowe Mr W Smith HEARING in the Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre at Auckland DATE OF HEARING 22 May 20...

10. PA v Standards Committee LCRO 267/2014 (30 June 2015) [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...for independent advice did not resolve that conflict. • Was aware that Mr SP had no right or capacity to give a mortgage over estate property. • Assisted in a transaction that he knew was a breach of trust. 5 • Failed to disclose matters material to the bank’s security. [31] The Committee determined that Mr PA’s conduct had breached rules 2.4 and 6.1 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, and directed that the complain...