Search Results

1. LCRO 252/2016 MY on behalf of BAT Ltd (12 March 2019) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...31 July 2014 $ 5,950.00 21 August 2014 $ 690.00 $ 8,950.00 The total amount due by BAT including GST and disbursements, was $10,584.75. [18] The Committee noted that Mr MY contended that Mr BJ had provided him with a quote of $1,000 for all matters up to the issue of the Statutory Demand and that Mr BJ’s first bill of costs was for three times that amount.3 Mr MY did not produce anything to support his contentions other than his own assertions. [19] The Committee addressed t...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 82 Smith Crane and Construction Ltd v Hall [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...and work in New Zealand. [13] Mr Badderly met Mr Hall in the UK on 9 July 2013; he provided an overview of the proposed role as Piling Manager. It was his conclusion that Mr Hall was keen to relocate and work for the business in New Zealand. Matters were left on the basis that a possible offer would be discussed with the Managing Director and a formal offer could potentially follow. [14] On 3 September 2013, Mr Badderly sent Mr Hall an email, annexed to which was a signed let...

3. KR v WH LCRO 141 / 2010 (14 May 2012) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...response until 26 June 2009, and the response was from WH. He again refers to the firm’s terms of engagement which informed clients that complaints could be referred to WG if the client did not wish to refer the complaint to the person acting in the matter. [18] With his complaint to the Complaints Service, KR included his letter of complaint to the firm dated 15 December. In that letter he also complained that WH had deducted the conveyancing costs from the additional funds whic...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 201 Cronin-Lampe v Board of Trustees of Melville High School [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...MELVILLE HIGH SCHOOL [2021] NZEmpC 201 [18 November 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 201 ARC 55/13 ARC 79/13 ARC 25/14 ARC 48/14 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of proceedings removed BETWEEN KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE First Plaintiff AND RONALD CRONIN-LAMPE Second P...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 144 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...direction that the defendant was to file and serve its statement of defence to the amended statement of claim by 4 pm on Monday 29 June 2015. A further telephone directions conference was scheduled for 9 am on Thursday 2 July 2015 to progress matters. These directions were made by consent with a view to an early substantive fixture. [5] A Minute was also issued after that second directions conference. A hearing was then scheduled for 5-7 October 2015 (inclusive), the case’s cur...

6. Taukiri – Parish of Karamu Lot 197A (2013) 52 Waikato Maniapoto MB 294 (52 WMN 294) [pdf, 134 KB]

   52 Waikato Maniapoto MB 294 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20120007633 UNDER Section 131, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application to determine the status of Parish of Karamu Lot 197A Block BETWEEN TREVOR TE AROHA NGAHOE TAUKIRI AND KEVIN RUSSELL TAUKIRI Applicants Hearing: 26 October 2012 (Heard at Hamilton) Appearances: Mrs L M S Farquhar, Counsel for the Applicant Ms L Blomfield, Counsel for...

7. BORA Biosecurity Law Reform Bill [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...any kind and any form.” • Clause 30 of this Bill substitutes new s 35 into the Biosecurity Act, which will require a person in a biosecurity control area to answer all questions asked by an inspector relating to their personal details or a matter the inspector requires for the purpose of exercising a power, function or duty. This may raise freedom of expression issues because the right also extends to the freedom to not say certain things. [1] Similarly, cl 42 inserts new s 105E in...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 97 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 312 KB]

   ...material before the Court at present, I consider that Mr Noble’s position is arguable, but not strongly arguable. Should an order be made? [44] The factors I have considered to this point strongly suggest that the interests of justice require the making of an order for security. Mr Noble’s claim will be challenging, and in balancing the interests of the parties, it must be acknowledged that BCL is in a considerably more vulnerable position as to costs than is Mr No...

9. Consent Order ENV-2016-AKL-000194 Highgate Business Park Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...decision or determination on the merits pursuant to s 297. [7] The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) All parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order. (b) All parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court's endorsement fall within the Court's jurisdiction and conform to the relevant requirement and objectives of the RMA, including in particular Part 2. [8] The Court has also read the parties submission...

10. LCRO 10/2016 CT v WN (31 October 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...statements’. 4 The critical statements The Committee did not:5 accept that Mrs CT told Mr WN, prior to receiving the strike out decision, that the critical statements or any such similar statements were made to her by ACC. These were matters which Mr WN knew were critical to the claim and therefore specifically questioned her about in the process of drafting the claim. Had these matters been previously raised with Mr WN, we would expect there to be a record of this on his fi...