LCRO 95/2019 CM v DL (9 March 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]
...paid to Mr DL.2 Mr DL responded to this request to inform Mr CM that he had outstanding invoices with his firm. 1 On occasions it was difficult to determine from the submissions of both parties, whether a particular submission was addressing matters arising from Mr CM’s 20[XB] or 20[XX] convictions. 2 As will become apparent later in this decision, the question as to whether Mr CM had paid $3,000 to Mr DL, whilst seemingly uncontested by the parties during the course of the conduct...