Search Results

1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Horsley [2014] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...practitioner to call further evidence in order that he not be disadvantaged by such a late amendment. [5] The practitioner filed a further affidavit and although there was exception taken to one paragraph, no further cross-examination occurred because the matters had already been canvassed in the earlier cross-examination. 4 [6] On 18 February submissions were heard in respect of the amended charge and evidence. The Tribunal reserved its decision and adjourned the matter t...

2. TN v LR LCRO 42/2013 (14 April 2016) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...recorded their discussion. Z then provided an affidavit in support of the High Court application. The liquidators, including Mr TN, opposed that application and asked the High Court to rule Z’s affidavit inadmissible. Heath J dealt with those matters. [4] Towards the end of the hearing before Heath J, Mr NR informed the Court that the meeting between Z and Mr TN had been recorded and transcribed, a fact of which both Mr TN and his lawyers had been unaware. This information concerne...

3. Lam v The Real Estate Agents Authority NZREADT 15 [pdf, 211 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 15 READT 005/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Act BETWEEN PETER LAM Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 413) First Respondent AND JIANINE (DI) AUSTIN Second Respondent On the papers: Appearances: Mr P Lam, Appellant Ms N Copeland on behalf of the First Respondent Ms A Robertson, on behalf of the Second Respond...

4. [2016] NZSSAA 020 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 71 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 020 Reference No. SSA 044/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Hamilton against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at HAMILTON on 10 March 2016 APPEARANCES The appellant in person L Preiss for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of So...

5. Williams v Cotter-Arlidge - Okaihau 3C2 (2019) 77 Tākitimu MB 51 (77 TKT 51) [pdf, 416 KB]

   ...112 (35 TKT 112) 4 137 Napier MB 19 (137 NA 19) 5 Puriri - Okaihau No3C No2 (2013) 28 Tākitimu MB 129 (28 TKT 129) at [32] 6 31 Tākitimu MB 212 (31 TKT 212) 77 Tākitimu MB 53 to the trust and was engaged for general accounting and tax matters. Mr Williams believed he was tasked with doing everything required in terms of the tax issues the trust was facing, and to help with the Court’s review of the trust. [8] In addition, Mr Williams says he had previously worked for the...

6. Mio - Torere Reserve (2024) 328 Waiariki MB 78 (328 WAR 78) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...issues as to vacancies that had arisen due to resignations, and whether those trustees who had resigned could still vote at meetings. The appointment of a chairperson was also challenged. In addition, concerns were also expressed about financial matters that needed to be addressed. [10] The trustees convene their monthly meetings on the third Monday of the month. At the hearing, the trustees agreed to hold their next meeting on the Monday following the Court hearing being 24 June...

7. Whaanga v Niania - Anewa Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 428 (2011 APPEAL 428) [pdf, 308 KB]

   WHAANGA V NIANIA MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 428 [19 August 2011] IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 428 (2011 APPEAL 428) A20110002361 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against an order of the Maori Land Court made on 14 December 2010 at 11 Tairawhiti MB 46-55 in respect of the Anewa Block BETWEEN MERE JOSLYN WHAANGA Appellant AND DICK NI

8. AI v ZO LCRO 215 / 2011 (21 June 2013) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...at the review, and considered the information he provided, I discerned that some of this information appeared to be inconsistent with some parts of the Practitioner’s responses to the Standards Committee. 2 [4] In relation to those matters the Practitioner was asked to provide further comments for the review. I received the Practitioner’s comments, and having considered them I formed a view that they did not wholly address all of the discrepancies and that some furth...

9. Director of Human Rights Proceedings [NKR] v Accident Compensation Corporation (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...the investigating officer’s preliminary view, her letter dated 24 March 2010 referred exclusively to Nayland Physiotherapy. It made no reference at all to Richmond. In her evidence Ms Henderson deposed that she did not refer to Richmond as that matter seemed to have been resolved and the investigating officer in his letter dated 16 February 2010 did not ask for information about the provision by ACC of information to Richmond. [14] It is relevant to note that in an almost contempora...

10. Stock v Morris - Wainui 2D2B (2012) 41 Taitokerau MB 121 (41 TTK 121) [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...non-owner. Mariao claims ownership of the cottage and is supported by her fellow owners. Rex paid for the construction of the cottage and claims a monetary interest. There is no real evidential dispute. The central issue is, how should the Court do justice between the parties within the parameters of the Act? [2] I regret the delay in issuing this decision, particularly given the age of the parties. However, I had hoped that this matter would be concluded in conjunction with...