Search Results

1. [2019] NZEmpC 159 Allied Investments Ltd t/a Allied Security v Cradock [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...the Authority which provide the necessary description of background circumstances, and then analyse each of the three issues in light of the evidence and submissions presented by each party. The determination [7] After describing introductory matters, the Authority set out the material provisions of the IEA. For present purposes they are: Terms of agreement 1.0 This agreement shall come into effect on 3rd July 2017 ... and shall remain in force until renegotiated or terminat...

2. Ashworth v Kent (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 55 [pdf, 475 KB]

   ...whom that section applies, has not referred the person to the Director of Proceedings under section 45(2)(f); or (b) the Director of Proceedings declines or fails to take proceedings. [13] The limitation on the right to bring proceedings where the matter has been resolved by agreement between the parties has no application on the facts but is referred to for completeness. The ACC bar and the claim for exemplary damages [14] Section 52(2) of the HDCA explicitly prohibits the award...

3. RIS Privacy Bill further Cabinet decisions [pdf, 390 KB]

   1 Regulatory Impact Statement Additional decisions for the Privacy Bill Agency Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. 2. The options presented in this paper relate to previous decisions by Cabinet to reform the Privacy Act (the Act) to send strong signals about the importance of privacy of personal information. • The first part of the paper responds to the recommendations of the Data Futures Forum (DFF...

4. BORA Policing Bill [pdf, 415 KB]

   Policing Bill 12 December 2007 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: POLICING BILL 1. We have assessed whether the Policing Bill (PCO 8297/13) (‘the Bill') is consistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the Bill of Rights Act'). We understand that the Bill is to be considered by the Cabinet Legislation Committee at its meeting on Thursday 13 December 2007. 2. We have concluded that the Bill appears to

5. [2012] NZEmpC 154 NZ Meat Workers Union v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 83 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS UNION V AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC WN [2012] NZEmpC 154 [6 September 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2012] NZEmpC 154 WRC 44/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS UNION Plaintiff AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by way of submissions dated 5 September 2011 and 5 July 2012 and 8, 10, 15 Augu...

6. Goher v Hammadieh [2016] NZIACDT 1 (14 January 2016) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...In person Date Issued: 13 January 2016 2 DECISION This complaint [1] This decision imposes sanctions, following a decision upholding a complaint against Mr Hammadieh in [2015] NZIACDT 44; the decision can be located at www.justice.govt.nz. [2] Mr Hammadieh accepted instructions to lodge an expression of interest, and application for residence. He: [2.1] Gave negligent advice, telling the complainant she could claims skills in an occupational category for which...

7. CAC10073 v Philip Kenny Real Estate Ltd [2013] NZREADT 19 [pdf, 41 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 19 READT 005/12 IN THE MATTER OF a charge laid under s.91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY CAC 10073 Prosecutor AND PHILIP KENNY REAL ESTATE LTD (LICENSED AGENT) Defendant MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Ms N Dangen - Member HEARD at CHRISTCHURCH on 27 February 2013 DATE OF DECISION 8 Ma...

8. MacMillan v NZ Parole Board [2013] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 61 KB]

   ...DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT STATEMENT OF CLAIM The application [1] This is an application by the defendant that these proceedings be summarily dismissed ahead of trial on the grounds that the proceedings are clearly untenable as a matter of law. [2] In Mackrell v Universal College of Learning High Court Palmerston North CIV2005- 485-802, 17 August 2005 at [48] Wild J held that the Tribunal has a wide discretionary power to strike out or dismiss a proceeding brought before...

9. Steele v Salisbury School (Costs) [2012] NZHRRT 26 [pdf, 61 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 26 Reference No. HRRT 022/2011 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARCUS JAMES STEELE PLAINTIFF AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SALISBURY SCHOOL DEFENDANT AT NELSON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms J Grant MNZM, Member Ms S Ineson QSM, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Steele in person Mr DM O’Neill for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 16 December 20...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 144 CE of Social Development v Tuilaepa [pdf, 482 KB]

    THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT v MA'AUGA TUILAEPA NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 144 [15 November 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 144 EMPC 158/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Plaintiff AND MA'AUGA TUILAEPA...