Search Results

1. Directory of Official Information V-Z [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Directory of Official Information Listings V-Z About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz mailto:oi...

2. Directory of Official Information V-Z [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Directory of Official Information Listings V-Z About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz mailto:oi...

3. Directory of Official Information V-Z [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Directory of Official Information Listings V-Z About This is a living document. We endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email oia@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. We can send you a MS Word version if you need. Ministerial Relations and Services Strategy, Governance & Finance Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture oia@justice.govt.nz mailto:oi...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - The new approach revisited [pdf, 586 KB]

   ...budgets for this phase. (f) Decision on whether or not to establish a research coordinating and monitoring body to oversee the research programme – these have been deployed in the Wairarapa ki Tararua and CNI inquiries, for example. 2.8 Once these matters are known and understood, with any areas of difficulty addressed and resolved, the main activity over the next several months will be historical research. Annexure 1: the standard new approach Page 11 Judicial conferences for monito...

5. LCRO 47/2025 FI v SD (30 September 2025) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...nevertheless “considered all the information provided in reaching its decision and focused on what appears to be the key issues in the complaint”.3 [34] I have adopted a similar approach in addressing the issues Mr FI raises on review. The matters to be addressed on review are: (a) Did Ms SD, in dealing with Mr FI’s request to file his reasons with the Family Court, breach any duties or obligations owed to Mr FI? (b) Did the termination of the retainer between Mr FI and Ms...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 042 Wilson v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...decision. [2] Dr Kluza is an employee of the Biosecurity New Zealand Tiakiatanga Pūtaiao Aotearoa (‘BioNZ’) a division of the Ministry for Primary Industry (‘MPI’). In that statutory capacity, he has been in discussions on biosecurity matters with OAL representatives and counsel. Understandably, MPI is anxious to preserve its independent statutory position on any individual resource consent application. As Dr Kluza has explained to OAL, MPI’s preference is “that an i...

7. NZCASS Main findings report [pdf, 12 MB]

   2014 NEW ZEALAND CRIME AND SAFETY SURVEY TE RANGAHAU O AOTEAROA MŌ TE TAIHARA ME TE HAUMARUTANGA 2014 Main Findings Acknowledgements This report was produced by the Research and Evaluation Team within the Ministry of Justice. The Ministry of Justice acknowledges and thanks the 6943 New Zealanders who gave their time to take part in the New Zealand Crime and Safety Survey 2014. We would also like to thank all the external experts who contributed to the project: James Reilly, Yvette T

8. FT Ltd v D Ltd [2020] NZDT 1418 (27 November 2020) [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the proceedings. PLEASE NOTE: Parties need to be aware they cannot appeal a Referee’s finding of fact. Where a Referee has made a decision on the issues raised as part...

9. Mauve v Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...desirable to do so. [71] To determine whether it is desirable to do so, the Tribunal must consider whether there is material before the Tribunal to show specific adverse consequences sufficient to justify an exception to the fundamental rule of open justice.25 The Tribunal must also consider whether an order is reasonably necessary to secure the “proper administration of justice” in proceedings before it and ensure it does no more than is necessary to achieve that.26 [72]...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 145 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 940 KB]

    ...That might, in part, be informed by the fact that the well-resourced employer was best placed, if it took issue with the employee’s version of events, to lead relevant evidence through its own witnesses. Ultimately the Court’s task is to do justice as a matter of equity and good conscience — and the route to a just and equitable outcome may vary from case to case. Inadmissible opinion [100] A further ground of objection relates to “inadmissible opinion”, which the seco...