LCRO 203/2017 HI v JK (6 August 2020) [pdf, 314 KB]
...representation. (b) There was no evidence to establish that any delay on Mr JK’s part in attending a court hearing had caused Mr HI to suffer any prejudice in the proceedings. (c) Mr JK had responded to Mr HI’s enquiries in a reasonably timely matter. (d) There was no persuasive evidence to support suggestion that Mr JK had advised Mr HI to provide misleading evidence to the court. (e) It was unable, on the face of the conflicting accounts provided by the parties, to determi...