Search Results

1. LCRO 207/2015 CA v BE (21 August 2018) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...company’s position. Mr BE responded to the correspondence received from the company. [5] On 6 August 2015, Mrs CA complained to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) about the content and tone of Mr BE’s correspondence. [6] The matter progressed to the Employment Relations Authority and was resolved at mediation on [Date] 2015. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [7] The substance of Mrs CA’s complaint was that: (a) Mr BE had handled the e...

2. [2018] NZSSAA 25 (25 May 2018) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...reasoning tested in an oral hearing. [5] As the parties affirmed that they wished the Authority to hear the matter on the papers, that has been the form of the hearing. However, we remain concerned that the parties have not addressed significant matters in the materials we are required to consider. Accordingly, this is an interim decision; it indicates our views based on the material we have considered. However, we will give the parties the opportunity to call oral evidence and prov...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 157 Labour Inspector v Cypress Villas Ltd full court [pdf, 515 KB]

   LABOUR INSPECTOR (MELISSA ANN MACRURY) v CYPRESS VILLAS LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 157 [16 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 157 ARC 31/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LABOUR INSPECTOR (MELISSA ANN MACRURY) Plaintiff AND CYPRESS VILLAS LIMITED Defendant AND BARRY EDWARD BRILL Proposed Second Defendant Hearing: 1

4. LCRO 173/2014 G NP and H NP v DC (27 September 2018) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...appeared in court. They filed a considerable number of documents including an application to remove R’s father as a guardian. [18] The formal proof hearing did not proceed. The presiding judge invited submissions as to costs, and adjourned the matter for that issue to be argued and determined. [19] Through their lawyer, the NPs applied for costs and submitted that costs should be ordered against Ms DC personally. [20] The Family Court’s costs decision was delivered on 15 N...

5. EA v FC LCRO 91 / 2011 (20 December 2013) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...152(2)(c) of the Act on the basis that Mr DP’s conduct did not raise professional concerns. In relation to the ZZU website issue the Committee had “...noted its reliance on her translations of the postings and that any further investigation of the matter would require a third party supplied translation”. 4 [10] It is relevant to this present review to note that Ms FC sought a review of that part of the Committee’s decision concerning the ZZU issue. I dealt with that review...

6. Director of Proceedings (EFG) v Commissioner Police [2012] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 87 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 8 Reference No. HRRT 033/2010 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS [EFG (NO. 2)] PLAINTIFF AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr R Musuku, Member Mr B Neeson, Member Mr R Stevens for plaintiff Ms S McKechnie for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 44 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...whether there is a serious arguable case for trial substantively between the parties. If so, the second question is where the balance of convenience will lie between them pending substantive judgment. The third consideration is whether the overall justice of the case warrants the making of an interlocutory injunctive order because it is equitable and discretionary. [8] The defendants contend that what they accept will be otherwise unlawful strike action will nevertheless not be so...

8. Mr M v CAC 20004 & Lewin & Lewin [2013] NZREADT 63 [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...the agency. The decision should be primarily educative. [19] The Tribunal make this order pursuant to s 108 upon the grounds: 1. It is appropriate in this case that Mr M’s private interests outweigh the public interests and openness of justice. The Tribunal’s decisions in this area having been developing agents understanding of the law and it is therefore appropriate that Mr M’s name be suppressed but the educative needs of the profession met by publishing an anonymised de...

9. Studer - Rangitaiki Allotment 28 C1 (2014) 97 Waiariki MB 294 (97 WAR 294) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...formal written order in 2009 after the appropriate plans had been procured. In addition, I understand from the Court file that as part of the Mäori Freehold Land Registration Project the surveys for this land were undertaken by the Ministry of Justice in accordance with that project. [14] At the time that the original hearing was held in 2004 it was made plain that the purpose of the partition was to enable the late Mrs Studer to provide sections for dwellings for her children and...

10. BORA Companies and Limited Partnerships Amendment Bill [pdf, 352 KB]

    ...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omission...