Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8027 items matching your search terms

  1. [2019] NZREADT 58 - Beckett - ruling (13 December 2019) [pdf, 163 KB]

    ...references, and a typed document headed 2 The 20 working day appeal period in respect of the penalty decision expired on 18 November 2019. “REA Response”. This sets out a number of factual matters disputed by the applicant. The Tribunal understands that a Notice of Appeal was not included with this email. [20] The Tribunal understands that Ms Beckett may have been advised by the Authority that an appeal should not be file...

  2. [2018] NZSSAA 49 (4 October 2018) [pdf, 234 KB]

    [2018] NZSSAA 49 Reference No. SSA 002/2018 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair K Williams - Member C Joe - Member Hearing at Tauranga on 28 June 2018 Final submissions filed 17 September 2018 Appearances The appellant in person; XXXX, the appellant’s wif...

  3. BL v Accident Compensation Corporation (Overseas Personal Injury) [2023] NZACC 106 [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 106 ACR 173/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN BL Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 21 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: L Wilkie for the Appell...

  4. Harihona v Heta - Te Pupuke C1B1 [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2025 APPEAL 167) [pdf, 251 KB]

    ...MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE TAITOKERAU In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Taitokerau District AP-20240000012768 APPEAL 2024/11 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Te Pupuke C1B1 and Other Blocks I WAENGA I A Between HUARANGI HARIHONA & WILLIAM RUDOLPH Ngā Kaitono pīra Appellants ME And ARENA HETA, ERIMANA TANIORA, LAVAKIMATA MARGARET-ROSE FANEVA, LOIS...

  5. [2025] NZEmpC 133 Burgess v Tutton Sienko and Hill Partnership (Interlocutory Judgment (reissued) of Judge KG Smith 1 July 2025) [pdf, 200 KB]

    ...GARY OWEN BURGESS v TUTTON SIENKO AND HILL PARTNERSHIP [2025] NZEmpC 133 [1 July 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2025] NZEmpC 133 EMPC 462/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN GARY OWEN BURGESS Plaintiff AND TUTTON SIENKO AND HILL P...

  6. LCRO 13/2019 RA v LO (23 September 2019) [pdf, 146 KB]

    ...RA on a number of occasions prior to the court fixture that had been set down for hearing on 15 March 2018. (b) There was little risk in Ms RA signing an undertaking, where she had faced possibility of a final protection order being made if the matter had proceeded to a hearing. (c) Ms RA and her support person appeared to be receptive to the suggestion that the matter be settled by way of filing of an undertaking. (d) Ms RA had expressed concern that the undertaking would remain...

  7. LCRO 84/2024 XA v MQ (25 February 2025) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...on the sale of their property and the purchase of an occupation licence in a retirement village. [11] Settlement of these transactions was scheduled for (and took place on) 20 October 2022. [12] Mrs YB assisted her parents with all of these matters. [13] Under cover of a letter dated 14 October 2022, copied to Mrs YB, Mr XA sent the following documents and statements to Mr NQ and Mrs MQ: • Settlement statements for the sale and purchase. • Trust account statements for t...

  8. Huata-Kupa v Tataraakina C -Tataraakina C Trust (2015) 40 Tākitimu MB 207 (40 TKT 207) [pdf, 244 KB]

    ...matter and allow the parties to move forward, in line with the objectives of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. If the Court was to refuse funding, Mr Kupa argued that Mrs Huata-Kupa would be forced to proceed without the resources to seek natural justice from the Court. [8] The initial estimate filed was for a special aid grant of $19,310.00, which Mr Kupa submitted was reasonable for a matter of this complexity. Invoices have subsequently been filed in the amounts of $7,233.90 and...

  9. Fitikefu v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...14 June 2010. It is accepted that with reasonable speed he complained to the Ombudsman on 10 August 2010. But as the complaint raised issues under the Privacy Act 1993 the correspondence was passed to the Privacy Commissioner who investigated the matter under IPP 11. The conclusion reached by the Commissioner was that there had been no breach of that principle with the result that on 20 November 2012 a Certificate of Investigation to that effect was issued. That brought the investigati...

  10. Annexure 2 - Scope Challenges [pdf, 281 KB]

    ...EPA.5 [4] The Environment Court, when considering the plan change, must apply cl 10(1) to (3) of Schedule 1 to the Act as if it were a local authority.6 Schedule 1 provides that the local authority must give a decision on the provisions and matters 1 Note: the court must consider all submissions filed whether or not the submitter is a party to the proceeding. 2 RMA, s 142(2). 3 Note: RMA, s 149E uses the term “proposed plan” and not “plan change”. Section 43AAC RMA d...