Search Results

1. Langston v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims process) [2024] NZACC 93 (30 May 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 093 ACAR 116/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN PAUL LANGSTON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: S Claver for the Appellant I Hunt for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 3...

2. Heng v Walshaw [pdf, 550 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00734 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN JOHN MONTGOMERY HENG AND ANNE ELIZABETH HENG Claimants AND CHRISTOPHER WALSHAW AND MARGARET ANNE WALSHAW First respondents (Intituling continued next page) Appearances: Scott Galloway, counsel for the claimants Chris Walshaw, for the first respondents Tim Cleary, counsel for the second respondent John Morrison, co

3. [2014] NZEmpC 134 Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...his truck, to collect Ms A’s possessions. Mr Booth made it clear that he was not in a state to deal with such issues. This is consistent with his text messages. Mr Bowling did not say that he wished to speak to Mr Booth about work related matters. He did not say that he was considering suspending Mr Booth. He did, however, say that he had spoken to the Police and would get them to come around, if that proved necessary. Not surprisingly, this inflamed the situation. [21] Mr B...

4. LCRO 143/2017 AC v BT (19 February 2019) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...disrespectful” towards Ms AC, and did not treat Ms AC with respect and courtesy. [110] As I have already noted, the Committee did not consider these aspects of Ms AC’s complaint. For that reason, particularly taking into account the rules of natural justice, it is not appropriate that I hear these matters on review, in effect, at first instance. [111] In my view, the appropriate course for me to take is to refer back to the Committee the whole of Ms AC’s complaint to reconsid...

5. LCRO 69/2021 ID v KZ and UG (7 September 2023) [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...ago, in June 2014, Mr KZ and Ms UG (the complainants) made a complaint to the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (NZLS) about the professional conduct of Mr ID.1 [2] Mr ID had acted for the complainants in respect of some litigation matters between October 2013 and March 2014. [3] The complaint was the subject of a determination by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) in December 2014. Mr ID applied to this Office for review of that determination. 1 N...

6. Howell v Jaram - Omaio 43 Section 4 [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 365 (2015 APPEAL 365) [pdf, 230 KB]

   2015 Maori Appellate Court MB 365 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT APPEAL 2014/8 A20140012298 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF OMAIO 43 SECTION 4 BLOCK BETWEEN EDWARD HOWELL, JOHN GERARD, PHILIP HOWELL AND ROTA GERARD AS TRUSTEES OF OMAIO 43 SECTION 4 Appellants AND IHAKA JARAM Respondent Hearing: 20 May 2015 (2015 Māori Appellate Court MB 221-257) (Heard at Ro...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 148 Auckland DHB & 20 Other DHB Named in the attached Schedule v NZ Resident Doctors Assoc [pdf, 56 KB]

   AUCKLAND DHB & 20 OTHER DHB NAMED IN THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE V NZ RESIDENT DOCTORS ASSOC AK 3 November 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 148 ARC 54/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AND 20 OTHER DISTRICT HEALTH BOARDS NAMED IN THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE Plaintiffs AND NEW ZEALAND RESIDENT DOCTORS ASSOCIATION Defendant Hearing: 4, 5 and 15 Sept...

8. Bradley v Jones - Miria Pene [2016] Chief Judge's MB 907 (2016 CJ 907) [pdf, 414 KB]

   2016 Chief Judge’s MB 907 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI REGISTRY A20110006581 CJ 2011/24 UNDER Section 45 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Miria Pene also known as Miria Jones or Miri Pene BETWEEN BARBARA-ANN BRADLEY Applicant AND POKIA JONES Respondent Judgment: 31 October 2016 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC

9. Samuel v Samuel - Succession to Te Urupiki Samuel (2025) 334 Waiariki MB 271 (334 WAR 271) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...271 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000023658 WĀHANGA Under Section 43, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession to Te Urupiki Samuel also known as Ruby Samuel or Ruby Strongman I WAENGA I A Between DELAREY SAMUEL AND RANGITEAORERE SAMUEL Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And REIHANA SAMUEL Te kaiurupare...

10. LCRO 144/2024 NQ v PW (28 March 2025) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...the relevant letters of engagement; (b) she provided the three invoices that had been issued and paid; (c) she expressed the view that the fee arrangement was fair and reasonable; (d) she explained that she was actively involved throughout the matter from receipt of instructions to its conclusion; (e) she agreed that she had appeared in Court only once and explained that most other appearances were of an administrative nature, that the appearances were delegated to other barristers...