Search Results

1. Edwards v Tatere – Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C1 (2018) 186 Waiariki MB 44 (186 WAR 44) [pdf, 351 KB]

   186 Waiariki MB 44 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20090012776 UNDER Section 79 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C1, Tamaki 2A1C Part (Lot DP7840) and Tamaki 2A2A (Balance) also known as Ngawapurua and Rua Roa Trusts BETWEEN TAU ANTHONY HOHEPA EDWARDS, BELINDA PUANANI EDWARDS, DONNA MAHUE MARSH, MICHELLE AWHINA EDWARDS, HESTER VANESSA EDWARDS AND JOSEPHINA MARIANA HENDERSON...

2. LCRO 8/2022 QQ v LW (8 October 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...an alternative and on the assumption that its application for stay is unsuccessful, the second defendants seek an order that CAL provide security for their costs. [6] His Honour dismissed both applications. [7] Mr FM was involved in two other matters involving Mr QQ’s clients. Mr FM was self-represented in one of those matters, and was represented by Mr BP in respect of the second matter. [8] On 2 December 2020, Mr QQ wrote to Mr FM at a residential address, and copied the let...

3. [2008] NZEmpC WC 15/08 Weston v Fraser [pdf, 59 KB]

   WESTON V FRASER WN WC 15/08 4 July 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 15/08 WRC 22/06 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FRANCIS WESTON Plaintiff AND GARY FRASER Defendant Hearing: 28 May 2008 (Heard at New Plymouth) Appearances: N R Harding and E Evans, Counsel for Plaintiff M W S Nutsford, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 4 July 2008 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE BS TRAVIS [1] Th...

4. C v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...due to complexity and relevance of ongoing impairment allowance”. The referral documents included [redacted]. [8] A number of the reports included in the referral documents contained details concerning Mr C’s [redacted] health and family matters, in addition to other sensitive information. [9] On 19 September 2014, Aon requested a copy of the referral documents sent to Dr A by ACC and provided ACC with a copy of a “consent for the collection and release of information” form...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 059 Balmoral Developments (Outram) Limited v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 375 KB]

   ...authorities, including the court, must apply the NPS-HPL to land within the scope of cl 3.5(7)(a) where it is not excluded by the exemptions in cl 3.5(7)(b). [92] There is no retrospectivity in this approach and nor is it a breach of natural justice. [93] The NPS-HPL applies prospectively to matters which the Council and/or the Environment Court are required to make decisions about, after the commencement date of the NPS-HPL. The appellants will be able to bring evidence to the...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 079 Woolworths New Zealand Limited [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...Environment Court has the advantage of hearing de novo an application that has been thoroughly explored and tested before a consent authority. Even where an appellant seeks to decline a grant of consent, the parties will usually be able to confine the matters in issue. These differences may have costs implications. The Council’s application [10] The Council lodged an application seeking costs against Woolworths, in relation to the costs incurred subsequent to the filing of th...

7. Hutcheson v Houkamau - Porangahau 2B No 10 (2021) 88 Takitimu MB 118 (88 TKT 118) [pdf, 581 KB]

   ...Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20180005757 WĀHANGA Under Regulation 21, Māori Reservation Regulations 1994 Sections 37, 236, 237, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Porangahau 2B No 10 and Other Blocks (Rongomaraeroa Marae) I WAENGA I A Between AIMEE WHAITIRI HUTCHESON, NICHOLAS REIHANA SCIASCIA, RENEE KAHURANGI SCIASCIA AND WIKITORIA BROWN Ngā Kaitono Applicants...

8. LCRO 55/2020 MY v KA (5 October 2020) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...complaint [9] Mr KA lodged a complaint against Mr MY with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) on 20 March 2019. He said: (a) Mr MY had misspelt Mrs KA’s name on the Title. (b) Mr MY had said that it was a minor matter that did not affect ownership. (c) LINZ had told Mr KA that the error required correction. [10] By way of outcome Mr KA said “I just want to change my [wife’s] name correctly this is what I want from the lawyer.” [11] Attach...

9. [2024] NZLCDT 45 Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Jindal (24 December 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...publication of Mr Y’s photograph and assertions that a fellow lawyer was a liar arise out of the result of legal proceedings and therefore cannot be said to be unconnected with the provision of legal services. In the publication he referred to matters of law inviting defamation proceedings stating “truth is an absolute defence to any claim in defamation”. [23] While the Tribunal understands the force of Mr Jindal’s submission that the Tribunal should not put to one side the...

10. Evaluation of Parenting Through Separation programme [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    ‘Parenting Through Separation’ Programme Evaluation of the Evaluation of the ‘Parenting Through Separation’ Programme Prepared for the Ministry of Justice by Jeremy Robertson and Jan Pryor Roy McKenzie Centre for the Study of Families, Victoria University July 2009 Disclaimer All reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information provide