8027 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 51 READT 058/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ENAYATTULLAH (NATHAN) NAJIB Appellant/Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 403) First respondent AND BRUCE LINDSAY Second Respondent Hearing: 30 June 2016 (at Christchurch) Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Mr G Denley (Member)...
...REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 44 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 31 August 2021. [2] Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [2.1] A Consent Memorandum dated 10 August 2021; [2.2] An Agreed Summary of Facts, a copy of which is annexed and marked ‘A’. [3] In the C...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 174 ACR 235/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ADRIS WAHABI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 20 September 2023 Heard at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: Mr B Hinchcliff for the Appellant Mr L Hawes-Gandar and Ms F Becroft for the Res...
ARTHUR D RILEY & CO LTD V WOOD WN WC 18/08 8 October 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 18/08 WRC 25/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ARTHUR D RILEY & CO LIMITED Plaintiff AND JESSICA SHARON WOOD Defendant Hearing: 23 and 24 July 2008 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: T P Cleary and Blair Scotland, Counsel for Plaintiff D D Vincent and Ankit Bhasin, Counsel for Defendant...
...constituted misconduct. He sought: (a) Mr FP’s removal, as a trustee of the trust, and to have no “further involvement related to the accessway”; and (b) confirmation that Mr FP did not have the authority to act unilaterally on that matter. [13] There are three aspects to Mr EH’s complaint. 3 Position as trustee — misleading statements [14] First, Mr EH claims that Mr FP wrongly held himself out as a trustee in circumstances when the evidence showed that he...
A v N Limited [2019] NZEmpC 129 [17 September 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 129 EMPC 269/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN A Plaintiff AND N Limited Defendant Hearing: 26 March 2019 (Heard at Hamilton) Appearances: S McKenna and S R Fraser, counsel for...
...tentative, provisional and subjective views are expressed, must be a necessary part of the investigation and detection of offences. As long as they do not contain evidence which is not available from other sources, I see no threat to the administration of justices in their being protected by s 6(c) of the Act. [21] The Commissioner accepts that Tonkin does not provide the Police with carte blanche to withhold any and all personal information about Mr Holmes. It must still be shown that...
...notice of choice of option having been filed. The Registrar’s explanation was that when a spouse applies for probate it is not necessary to also file a notice of choice of option. [21] On 10 October 2014, Mrs OP again requested an update and wanted matters moved ahead. Ms UV’s response was that she had received a reply from the court and the documents would be sorted on Monday. [22] On 13 October 2014, Ms UV informed Mrs OP that the firm had changed ownership. Ms UV advised M...
...then asserts that an employment warning issued to her on 19 November 2009 disadvantaged her unjustifiably in her employment. This was because there was no substantive basis on which to issue the warning; the plaintiff was not afforded natural justice; she was given insufficient notice of this intended disciplinary action; and she had no opportunity to provide the defendant, as decision maker, with any explanation or information regarding that matter. [13] Next, in respect of a sig...
...for the name and contact details of Crestline’s director, Mr Reynolds. Mr Ian Graham did not disclose the true reason for his request. When Mr Donald Graham asked him, his son told him that he was proposing to type up notes about a number of matters relating to his father. Again unknown to Mr Donald Graham, Mr Ian Graham tracked down Mr Reynolds’ contact details including his telephone number. Mr Ian Graham telephoned Mr Reynolds and expressed his and his family’s concerns...