Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 144 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...direction that the defendant was to file and serve its statement of defence to the amended statement of claim by 4 pm on Monday 29 June 2015. A further telephone directions conference was scheduled for 9 am on Thursday 2 July 2015 to progress matters. These directions were made by consent with a view to an early substantive fixture. [5] A Minute was also issued after that second directions conference. A hearing was then scheduled for 5-7 October 2015 (inclusive), the case’s cur...

2. Taukiri – Parish of Karamu Lot 197A (2013) 52 Waikato Maniapoto MB 294 (52 WMN 294) [pdf, 134 KB]

   52 Waikato Maniapoto MB 294 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20120007633 UNDER Section 131, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application to determine the status of Parish of Karamu Lot 197A Block BETWEEN TREVOR TE AROHA NGAHOE TAUKIRI AND KEVIN RUSSELL TAUKIRI Applicants Hearing: 26 October 2012 (Heard at Hamilton) Appearances: Mrs L M S Farquhar, Counsel for the Applicant Ms L Blomfield, Counsel for...

3. BORA Biosecurity Law Reform Bill [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...any kind and any form.” • Clause 30 of this Bill substitutes new s 35 into the Biosecurity Act, which will require a person in a biosecurity control area to answer all questions asked by an inspector relating to their personal details or a matter the inspector requires for the purpose of exercising a power, function or duty. This may raise freedom of expression issues because the right also extends to the freedom to not say certain things. [1] Similarly, cl 42 inserts new s 105E in...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 97 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 312 KB]

   ...material before the Court at present, I consider that Mr Noble’s position is arguable, but not strongly arguable. Should an order be made? [44] The factors I have considered to this point strongly suggest that the interests of justice require the making of an order for security. Mr Noble’s claim will be challenging, and in balancing the interests of the parties, it must be acknowledged that BCL is in a considerably more vulnerable position as to costs than is Mr No...

5. Consent Order ENV-2016-AKL-000194 Highgate Business Park Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...decision or determination on the merits pursuant to s 297. [7] The Court understands for present purposes that: (a) All parties to the proceedings have executed the memorandum requesting this order. (b) All parties are satisfied that all matters proposed for the Court's endorsement fall within the Court's jurisdiction and conform to the relevant requirement and objectives of the RMA, including in particular Part 2. [8] The Court has also read the parties submission...

6. LCRO 10/2016 CT v WN (31 October 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...statements’. 4 The critical statements The Committee did not:5 accept that Mrs CT told Mr WN, prior to receiving the strike out decision, that the critical statements or any such similar statements were made to her by ACC. These were matters which Mr WN knew were critical to the claim and therefore specifically questioned her about in the process of drafting the claim. Had these matters been previously raised with Mr WN, we would expect there to be a record of this on his fi...

7. [2019] NZREADT 50 - Hu v CAC 416 & Yeung (14 November 2019) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...inadequate, the Appellant obtained the report from a private investigator to which reference has already been made. The report was provided to the Committee. At the conclusion of its report, the private investigator, Belso Investigations, summarised matters in a memorandum that it sent to the REA and which is undated. That report (“report”) expressed the view that the Authority needed to take additional steps to collect information that, in the view of the report writer,...

8. Mullane v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 417 KB]

   ...have jurisdiction to consider whether a remedy should be granted to Mr Mullane who seeks damages of between $165,000 to $200,000, the latter figure being the ceiling to the Tribunal’s jurisdiction at the time of the events in question. PRELIMINARY MATTERS Complaints made to other agencies – relevance of the outcome of those complaints [10] The events in question have led not only to the present proceedings under the Privacy Act but also (inter alia) to complaints to the Ombudsman,...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 175 Maynard v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 105 KB]

   CHRISTINE MAYNARD V BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 175 [22 December 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 175 ARC 118/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CHRISTINE MAYNARD Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 24 and 30 June and 15 July 2011 Appearances: Stan Austin, a...

10. CA v DO LCRO 68 / 2012 (26 September 2013) [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...decisions regarding relocating from my address in [address]. c. For the avoidance of doubt, this document has been drafted to prevent my relocating from [address]. d. I am making this statement knowing this will disempower my children in this matter. Signed: [DP] 25 November 2009 Witnessed by [CC], solicitor of the High Court and sworn this 25 th day of November at 138 Cambridge Terrace, Levin. Witnessed by [CD] – 25 November 2009 3 I, [DP] authorise...