Search Results

1. Ahoy v Henare - Parengarenga 3G Ahu Whenua Trust (2015) 108 Taitokerau MB 66 (108 TTK 66) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...relation to the Kaitaia Court sitting and issued directions to the Registrar to make adequate arrangements for the hearing on 15 December 2014. I understand suitable arrangements were made in accordance with standard protocols within the Ministry of Justice, however neither Mr Reeves nor Mr Henare attended the hearing. One or two other defendants may have attended the hearing. [8] Following the hearing on 15 December 2014, there have been further teleconferences on 17 February, 9...

2. Litchfield and Anor v The Country Cottage Co Limited [2011] NZWHT Auckland 33 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...dishwasher and was nearing completion. There is no information as to what date the property was viewed nor does she say that any building work was incomplete. The omissions referred to, such as curtains, white ware and furniture, are not construction matters but are more furnishing matters. The installation of these items has not been implicated in the dwelling leaking and was not required for construction to be considered to be complete. [11] Ms Macleod in her submissio...

3. BORA Financial Markets (Regulators and KiwiSaver) Bill [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...addition, as discussed above, any derivative evidence from an unlawfully compelled examination may not be used. [5] • We note that the FMA’s powers under cl 25(1)(d) may be exercised where an overseas regulator requests the FMA to inquire into any matter related to the functions of that overseas regulator. Clause 53(2) provides that the person subject to a request from an overseas regulator has the privilege against self-incrimination under s 60 of the Evidence Act 2006 as if that p...

4. Wai 2180 Taihape inquiry newsletter 1 June 2015 [pdf, 621 KB]

   ...concurrently inside each inquiry district. How do district inquiries run? District inquiries typically pass through five stages: 1. ‘Start-up’: The Tribunal identifies the claims, the claimants, the main issues, and any other preliminary matters. 2. ‘Research’: The Tribunal, the Crown and claimants undertake research to explore the issues raised by the claims. 3. ‘Interlocutories’: Claimants refine their statements of claim and assist the Tribunal in identifyi...

5. Barry v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 29 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...her full license will be cancelled, the penalty will be reduced to $2,000. Publication [48] The Tribunal will routinely publish the name of an Adviser and the reasons for its decision where a complaint is upheld. That is a usual incident of open justice. The decision will be published in the normal way. Order [49] The Adviser is censured. She is warned the opportunity this decision gives to re-establish her professional standing will require good faith, and commitment to attain the...

6. RR v SU & TT LCRO 189/2013 (29 September 2015) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...and Mr SU. [11] The complaints against Mr SU include allegations that he made false promises about the likelihood of success in the High Court proceeding and failed to advise the RRs that he had been “found guilty of negligence” in another matter by Justice Hansen, the presiding Judge in the High Court proceeding. Ms RR believes Mr SU has “alcohol problems [which] impaired his performance” generally and in particular when he made his closing submissions in the High Court...

7. NQE v Tan [2013] NZIACDT 46 (01 August 2013) [pdf, 131 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2013] NZIACDT 46 Reference No: IACDT 045/11 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY Immigration Advisers Authority Authority BETWEEN NQE Complainant AND Alyssa Lopez Tan Adviser THE COMPLAINANT’S NAME IS NOT TO BE PUBLISHED DECISION IMPOSITION OF DISCIPLINARY SANCTIO...

8. Green and Green v IT (Reinstatement of Second Plaintiff) [2016] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...August 2016 Jeremy signed a letter addressed to the Tribunal stating he was withdrawing his complaint. The letter was in the following terms: I [Jeremy Green] have made the decision to withdraw my complaint regarding IT. I do not wish to pursue this matter any further. [6] The letter was filed by [redacted] who signed her email as “Mental Health Advocate, [Redacted]”. The covering email from [redacted] was in the following terms: [Jeremy Green] has spoken to me regarding the com...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 37 Gapuzan v Pratt Whitney Air NZ [pdf, 157 KB]

   ROSAURO GAPUZAN v PRATT & WHITNEY AIR NZ SERVICES trading as CHRISTCHURCH ENGINE CENTRE NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 37 [26 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 37 CRC 22/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ROSAURO GAPUZAN Plaintiff AND PRATT & WHITNEY AIR NZ SERVICES trading as CHRISTCHURCH ENGINE CENTRE Defendant Hearing: (...

10. Baker v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) and Yu [2018] NZREADT 73 [pdf, 248 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 73 READT 034/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN LAURENCE NEIL BAKER Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 413) First Respondent AND LAN (BRENDA) YU Second Respondent Hearing: 6 November 2018, at Auckland Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms N Dangen, Member Mr N...