Search Results

1. BORA Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Bill [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...view in the exercise of its powers and functions • develop its own iwi and other consultative and reporting processes and to recommend such processes for adoption by the Board and staff of Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga when dealing with matters of interest to Māori • make recommendations to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga on applications referred by Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga under section 47(1)(b) that relate to sites of interest to Māori • consider and...

2. LCRO 24/2019 UC v SO (30 September 2020) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...email to Mr SO (18 March 2016). 6 This quotation is exactly as set out in Ms PT’s email. 3 (i) He handed to Ms PT at Mr UC’s office a memory stick containing information relating to the charge he faced together with unrelated personal matters and despite repeated requests they have not returned it; and (ii) the lawyers took $1,500 from him on account of fees and did not give him a receipt, nor render an invoice. Response to the complaint [10] In his response to the co...

3. LCRO 164/2019 SM v NL (25 June 2020) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...involvement with Mr SM since the termination of the retainer around November 2011; and (c) Mr SM had not raised concerns that Mr NL was conflicted when representing the party who had commenced the DVA proceedings against Mr SM; and (d) the DVA matters on which he had been instructed, were irrelevant to any work undertaken by him for Mr SM in the past. [12] The Standards Committee identified what it described as the key issue for its investigation as being a consideration as to w...

4. Brown v Progressive Enterprises Ltd (Strike-Out) [2024] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...application.3 It is apparent from these documents that he opposes his claim being struck out and considers it unjust for the strike-out application to be determined on the papers.4 However, Mr Brown’s submissions do not otherwise address any matters of substance that are relevant to whether his claim should be struck out on the basis it discloses no reasonable cause of action and do not clarify the prohibited ground of discrimination on which he relies. Rather, Mr Brown’s sub...

5. TN v LR LCRO 42/2013 (14 April 2016) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...recorded their discussion. Z then provided an affidavit in support of the High Court application. The liquidators, including Mr TN, opposed that application and asked the High Court to rule Z’s affidavit inadmissible. Heath J dealt with those matters. [4] Towards the end of the hearing before Heath J, Mr NR informed the Court that the meeting between Z and Mr TN had been recorded and transcribed, a fact of which both Mr TN and his lawyers had been unaware. This information concerne...

6. Lam v The Real Estate Agents Authority NZREADT 15 [pdf, 211 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 15 READT 005/18 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Act BETWEEN PETER LAM Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 413) First Respondent AND JIANINE (DI) AUSTIN Second Respondent On the papers: Appearances: Mr P Lam, Appellant Ms N Copeland on behalf of the First Respondent Ms A Robertson, on behalf of the Second Respond...

7. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Horsley [2014] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...practitioner to call further evidence in order that he not be disadvantaged by such a late amendment. [5] The practitioner filed a further affidavit and although there was exception taken to one paragraph, no further cross-examination occurred because the matters had already been canvassed in the earlier cross-examination. 4 [6] On 18 February submissions were heard in respect of the amended charge and evidence. The Tribunal reserved its decision and adjourned the matter t...

8. Whaanga v Niania - Anewa Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 428 (2011 APPEAL 428) [pdf, 308 KB]

   WHAANGA V NIANIA MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 428 [19 August 2011] IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRAWHITI DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 428 (2011 APPEAL 428) A20110002361 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against an order of the Maori Land Court made on 14 December 2010 at 11 Tairawhiti MB 46-55 in respect of the Anewa Block BETWEEN MERE JOSLYN WHAANGA Appellant AND DICK NI

9. Waitangi Tribunal Part 1 Report on stage 1 of the Te Paparahi o Te Raki inquiry [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   H e W H a k a p u t a n g a m e t e t i r i t i t H e D e c l a r a t i o n a n D t H e t r e a t y He Whakaputanga me te Tiriti The Declaration and the Treaty Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W A I 1 0 4 0 The Report on Stage 1 of the

10. AI v ZO LCRO 215 / 2011 (21 June 2013) [pdf, 109 KB]

    ...at the review, and considered the information he provided, I discerned that some of this information appeared to be inconsistent with some parts of the Practitioner’s responses to the Standards Committee. 2 [4] In relation to those matters the Practitioner was asked to provide further comments for the review. I received the Practitioner’s comments, and having considered them I formed a view that they did not wholly address all of the discrepancies and that some furth...