8497 items matching your search terms
DRIVESURE LIMITED v MATTHEW MCQUILLAN [2022] NZEmpC 176 [22 September 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 176 EMPC 45/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DRIVESURE LIMITED Plaintiff AND MATTHEW MCQUILLAN First Defendant AND SACHIN RAJ Second Defendant AND MOHAM...
The Ministry of Justice, and the Crown Law Office in the case of Bills developed by the Ministry of Justice, advise the Attorney-General on the consistency of all Bills with the Bill of Rights Act (with the exception of appropriation Bills, which are not scrutinised). The Attorney-General retains legal professional privilege in respect of unpublished advice written before January 2003, as well as unpublished advice written since January 2003 on Bills on which the Attorney-General has tabled a se...
...appropriate or necessary. The decision of the Committee adopted an opinion of Mr YY (as a costs assessor) which had been provided to the parties. Ms Hunstanton sought a review of that decision. [2] The application for review raised a number of matters which were not specifically dealt with by the decision of the Committee including a failure to obtain consent of the beneficiaries to the deduction of fees, a failure to provide time records, a discrepancy between the time-costed am...
...appropriate or necessary. The decision of the Committee adopted an opinion of Mr YY (as a costs assessor) which had been provided to the parties. Ms Hunstanton sought a review of that decision. [2] The application for review raised a number of matters which were not specifically dealt with by the decision of the Committee including a failure to obtain consent of the beneficiaries to the deduction of fees, a failure to provide time records, a discrepancy between the time-costed am...
...other issues arising from comments made on his conduct have been referred by a Committee to the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal). Mr DY would like the Committee’s decision reversed or “put with other matters” for which he is to appear before the Tribunal. [24] Mr DY adds that Mr UQ cannot be located. Review Hearing [25] Mr DY’s lawyer, Mr GP, attended a review hearing in Christchurch on 13 July 2018, saying Mr DY was too unwell...
...on the sale of the property. [6] Ms FM instructed a new lawyer. [7] She filed the complaint that has subsequently led to this review with the Complaints Service. [8] Whilst the complaint was being investigated, Ms WJ took steps to settle the matter through discussions with Ms FM’s new lawyer. A settlement was reached whereby Ms WJ paid Ms FM $760 as a contribution to the purchase of a new stove. [9] That so far as Ms FM was concerned was the end of the matter. She did not wi...
...permitted. In the middle there is an area where lawyers must read carefully. … Threats, scandalous allegations and other perils for stressed lawyers 16 … 1.2 … A hallmark of professionalism, particularly in contentious adversarial matters, is civility and the requirement to rise above the heat and intensity of conflict. This is the theme in many of the Conduct and Client Care Rules … 1.3 … The distinction needs to be made between (legitimate) fearless advocacy and...
...9 Trust, and an application by the current applicants seeking the removal of Mr Andrews as a trustee. I dismissed Mr Andrews’ application and ordered his removal as a trustee pursuant to s 240 of the Act.1 The applicants seek costs for these matters. [3] Mr Andrews submits that the applicants have brought this application following a significant and unreasonable delay and therefore seeks that it be dismissed. Kōrero whānui Background [4] This application arises following th...
...was going to be a relevant issue. She should have given evidence about this before the CAC. In any event, the relevance of this material is marginal in the view of the tribunal. [50] It is not considered therefore that the requirements of justice justify leave being granted to Ms Li to give the additional evidence which she seeks to on this matter. The facility of Ms Li in the English language [51] The appellant seeks leave to place further evidence before the court which...
[2017] NZSSAA 040 Reference No.SSA 172/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Mr G Pearson - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Mr C Joe - Member Hearing at Wellington on 19 June 2017 Appearances The appellant in person Ms Luxton (lawyer) and Ms Singh (agent), for Chief Executive of th...