8473 items matching your search terms
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 19 September 2022 Our ref: OIA 97846 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: non-discrimination in the Human Rights Act Thank you for your email of 23 July 2022, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), documents regarding non-discrimination in the Human Rights Act. Specifically, you requested: “…all infor...
...advice or notices. 4. Fee waiver applications can be made as usual via email. Please contact the Tribunal if you have any issues regarding the payment of fees. Additional arrangements for all regions under Traffic Light Red 5. All new matters will continue to be referred to a Judge and will be prioritised in the usual way. Parties are reminded of the ability to apply for priority. Any application should be supported by a full explanation as to why priority is sought. He...
New Organisms And Other Matters Bill 26 March 2003 Attorney-General Preliminary Legal Advice New Organisms And Other Matters Bill: Consistency With The New Zealand Bill Of Rights Act 1990 INTRODUCTION 1. We have considered the New Organisms and Other Matters Bill (PCO 5072/4) for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the "Bill of Rights Act"). We understand that the current intention is for this Bill to be considered by the Cabinet Legislation Comm...
...final submission and therefore didn’t have the opportunity to comment or challenge information [he considered] could easily be refuted, or provide[d] further factual information the Standards Committee could rely upon. In any system of natural justice there is always full disclosure and in this case there was not. 18 Morris v Morris [2015] NZHC 2315. 19 RV supporting reasons for application for review, at [2]. 7 [31] This s...
...some minor variations for some courts. Overnight arrests for 18 to 25-year olds will continue to be heard the next court day regardless of list type, then remanded to the next appropriate Young Adult List. Dealing with jointly charged co-accused matters Where charges are jointly filed and one defendant is aged 18-25 and the other is over 25, both are pleading not guilty, and the prosecution and defence counsel agree, the default position should be the co-accused are heard together...
...some minor variations for some courts. Overnight arrests for 18 to 25-year olds will continue to be heard the next court day regardless of list type, then remanded to the next appropriate Young Adult List. Dealing with jointly charged co-accused matters Where charges are jointly filed and one defendant is aged 18-25 and the other is over 25, both are pleading not guilty, and the prosecution and defence counsel agree, the default position should be the co-accused are heard together...
...Legislation Act 2020 and the COVID-19 Response (Requirements for Entities-Modifications and Exemptions) Act 2020. 6. There are 8 schedules to the Bill. These are organised by Ministerial portfolio. 7. We have not considered Schedule 6 (Ministry of Justice). This schedule is being considered by the Crown Law Office. 8. A summary of the amendments made in the Bill are set out below. Schedule 1 – Department of Internal Affairs 9. Schedule 1 amends the Gambling Act 2003 to extend b...
2013 Chief Judge’s MB 567 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20050016184 CJ 2005/57 A20060025171 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tauwhao-Te Ngare block (Formerly Rangiwaea 1A2C and Rangiwaea 1A1 blocks) BETWEEN THE TRUSTEES OF TAUWHAO-TE NGARE TRUST Applicant AND DONALD SHAW Respondent Hearing: 24 March 2009 at 137 Waikato MB 119-127 15 May 2009 at 98 Tauranga MB 175 16 June 2009 a...
...on the quantum of costs. Memoranda were then received from the parties containing their respective submissions on costs. [2] The issue of a judgment on costs should have then been straightforward. However, Mr Ikundabose sought to re-litigate matters by filing an application for a rehearing. The application for rehearing was filed outside the time limit for Mr Ikundabose to do so. He is a lay litigant representing himself. The application and accompanying documents explain his...
...of his conduct fell short of that required of a lawyer, he argued that it did not amount to a conflict of interest as characterised by the Committee. Mr XX for Mr Austell argued that the Committee failed to adhere to the principles of natural justice in the way it considered this matter in two regards. First, it was argued, the Committee failed to put to him the nature of the allegations against him. Second, once the Committee had concluded that a sanctionable breach had occurred, i...