KL v WS LCRO 160/2013 (15 June 2016) [pdf, 89 KB]
...application to have the counts of money laundering and importation dismissed prior to trial. There is also evidence of key prosecution evidence being challenged by cross examination during the trial. Which witness are cross examined, and how, are also matters for the exercise of counsel’s professional judgement. Again, there is no evidence to suggest that judgement was plainly wrong. [18] Mr KL’s complaints against Ms WS are wide ranging criticisms of Ms WS’s management of the...