Search Results

1. Family Court E solution Amendment Rules 2024 PCO26422 v1.23 4 December 2024 Consultation version.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...in rule 8(1) information means information in electronic form Example — information in document The information may be information contained in a document (for example, an electronic copy of a paper, or other non-electronic, document). It does not matter whether the document is, or has ever been, in the custody or control of the court. It also does not matter how legislation outside this Part refers to the document (for example, whether it is called any authority, declaration, direction, doc...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 187 Walker v Delta Community Support Trust [pdf, 187 KB]

   FIONA WALKER v DELTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT TRUST NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 187 [30 September 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 187 CRC 38/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to objection to disclosure BETWEEN FIONA WALKER Plaintiff AND DELTA COMMUNITY SUPPORT TRUST Defendant Hearing: (by documents dated...

3. CR v TN LCRO 54/2014 (23 November 2016) [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...2 were included in charges brought against Mr CR before the Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal. [5] In 2007 Mr TN and Mr CR acted for opposing parties in litigation. Mr TN’s client was Mr VH. [6] Mr CR was unhappy with various matters that arose during the course of that litigation and in December 2010 he commenced proceedings personally against Mr TN and Mr VH. He pleaded five causes of action: • maintenance/champerty; • abuse of process (malicious civil proc...

4. Te Hokowhitu v Proprietors of Matauri X - Matauri X [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 566 (2010 APPEAL 566) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...MATAURI X MAC A20080005020 19 November 2010 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT 2010 MAORI APPELLATE COURT MB 566 (2010 APPEAL 566) A20080005020 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Matauri X BETWEEN MATIU TE HOKOWHITU Appellant AND PROPRIETORS OF MATAURI X Defendant Coram: Deputy Chief Judge C L Fox Judge STA Milroy Judge C T Coxhead Appearances: Martin Taylor (for the Appellant) Wayne C...

5. Rogers v Wiringi - Succession to Ngahuiatapu Rogers [2024] Chief Judge's MB 1844 (2024 CJ 1844) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...Court. As the Chief Judge, or Deputy (acting on delegation) are judges of the Court, I consider that we must be able to exercise the powers of the Court in performing our function pursuant to s 44 of the Act to ensure we can serve the interests of justice. However, I am open to hearing from the parties with respect to this matter. [5] As neither party to the proceedings made submissions on whether or not I had jurisdiction to determine the present application, I granted the app...

6. [2018] NZEmpC 100 Elisara v Allianz NZ Ltd [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...CHRISTINA INGLIS APPLICATION FOR FURTHER AND BETTER DISCLOSURE Background [1] The interlocutory issue before the Court relates to the disclosure of certain categories of documents which the plaintiff asserts are, or may be, relevant to the matters at issue in the proceedings and which the defendant says need not be disclosed for various reasons, some of which have ‘morphed’ over time. The application raises a number of issues, including the extent to which privilege attach...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Hinton J, 25 September 2017. 7 National Standards Committee v Denham [2017] NZLCDT 10. 8 Auckland Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society v X [2011] NZLCDT 15. 9 incorrect insurance claim for lost property. In Denham9 the matter was personal conduct in which the practitioner pursued a private prosecution against her former husband, later held to be an abuse of process. The practitioner was acting in her personal capacity in the litigation and in fact had onl...

8. Keepa v Leighton - Kiwinui Trust [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 367 (2025 APPEAL 367) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...tētahi tātaritanga: [10] The Māori Appellate Court in Matchitt v Matchitt consolidated the relevant principles for determining an application for leave to appeal out of time.3 The overarching consideration is where the overall interests of justice lie.4 Such inquiry involves considering the following relevant factors:5 (a) te rahinga o te tōmuritanga kia tukua te tono pīra me ngā take e pērā ai; (a) the length of the delay in filing the appeal and the reasons...

9. Te Manutukutuku Issue 31 [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...government, pub­ lic, business and Maori sectors, and has received' the Queen's Service medal, the Queen's commemorative medal and the Sir Kingi Ihaka honours awards. Over the past three decades he has worked in the areas of justice, education, health, broadcasting, youth programmes sport and recreation. He has also been associated with iwi business and man­ agement developments. His ties with the Tribunal stretch back to its genesis. He was secretary to f...

10. [2021] NZREADT 42 - Complaints Assessment Commitee v Vulinovich (6 August 2021) [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...the Authority in an attempt to absolve himself from the unsatisfactory conduct. [38] Ms Wood submitted the appropriate penalty for Mr Vulinovich is an order for censure and a period of suspension of his licence. Discussion [39] As his Honour Justice Brewer accepted in Prasad,13 an order for cancellation will generally be the starting point for penalty orders in cases of proven dishonesty, but it is not the invariable outcome. Determination of the penalty to be imposed in a part...