Search Results

1. Taueki v Taueki - Horowhenua No 11B Subdivision 14 (2021) 437 Aotea MB 134 (437 AOT 134) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...Philip Taueki, Bradley Taueki, James Broughton, Clement Taueki, Adrian Henare, Josephine Huriwai, John Shortcliffe and Justine Agbede. By 2 June 2017, the remaining trustees were Philip Taueki, Bradley Taueki, Clement Taueki, Adrian Henare and Justice Agbede.5 [8] According to the Horowhenua District Council, the trust owes rates of $4,255.49 on the Horowhenua11B 41 North B3 North Section 1 block, and $13,316.25 on Horowhenua 11B 41 South Section 2B2 as of 30 June 2021. Ko te hā...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 138 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR INSPECTORATE [2022] NZEmpC 138 [3 August 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 138 EMPC 85/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for recusal BETWEEN SERENITY PILGRIM, ANNA COURAGE, ROSE STANDTRUE, CRYSTAL LOYAL, PEARL VALOR AND VIRG...

3. TE v Wellington Standards Committee LCRO 100/2010, 92/2011, 153/2012 (1 February 2013) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...its determination with regard to the conduct issues complained of by NT. The determination dated 2 March 2011 [10] The Standards Committee issued its determination concerning TE’s conduct on 22 March 2011. That determination addressed the matters raised by NT in her submissions dated 23 August 2010 which she had provided in response to the Notice 3 of Hearing issued on 12 August 2010. These submissions were received by the Complaints Service on 27 August 2010...

4. Te Manutukutuku 73 [pdf, 9.5 MB]

   ...Waitangi Tribunal Level 7, Fujitsu Tower 141 The Terrace Wellington New Zealand DX SX11237 Tel : 64 4 914 3000 Fax : 64 4 914 3001 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Te Manutukutuku is produced and published by the Waitangi Tribunal Unit of the Ministry of Justice, and every effort has been made to ensure that it is true and correct at the date of publication. Te Rohe Pōtae Handover This issue features the release of the first two parts of the Tribunal’s report on the claims of Ngāti M...

5. Ngati Pahauwera Affidavits 2 of 4 [pdf, 11 MB]

   6 Vilma Hape photo 23: Raupunga School Beach trip to Mohaka 1999 - driftwood teepee and parent Vilma Hape photo 24: Raupunga School Beach trip to Mohaka 1999 - fire with children and parent, note fire is contained with rocks for safety 6 Vilma Hape photo 23: Raupunga School Beach trip to Mohaka 1999 - driftwood teepee and parent Vilma Hape photo 24: Raupunga School Beach trip to Mohaka 1999 - fire with children and parent, note fire is contained with rocks for safety Page 158

6. CAC 20003 v Weldrand [2013] NZREADT 78 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...complainant wanting to know why the sale was not proceeding and, according to the complainant, persisted in such questioning by a number of telephone calls and, allegedly, verbally abused the complainant. [12] After a while, in order to settle matters down between them, the complainant purchased a bottle of wine and, in about late August 2011, delivered it to the licensee’s office. However, that evening, the licensee arrived at the complainant’s home (which is also his place of wo...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 199 Toomey v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...appeal under s274 of the Act is that they are both a person who has an interest in the proceedings that is greater than the interest that the general public has within the meaning ofs274(1)(d). CWH also says that it made a submission on some of the matters included in the appeal, which would enable it to be a party in terms of s274(1)(e). I note that none of the trade competition provisions referred to in s274 are applicable to CWH orWBGT. [21] CWH says that its interest is in the...

8. LCRO 196/2016 GY v SO (15 September 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...possibly the United Kingdom, Ms GY thought that she may need a New Zealand parenting order for PM. She made an internet search for lawyers practising in [Town]. On 8 April 2016 at 1.10 pm she telephoned [Town] Family Law to make enquiries about that matter. [6] Ms GY informed the receptionist who answered her call that she wanted to make enquiries about obtaining a parenting order. The receptionist requested her name, PM’s name, and then Mr YR’s name for the stated purpose of...

9. JD v RU LCRO 55 / 2011 (22 March 2012) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...intention or not, that is how Mr RU’s client felt and Mr RU felt some duty to try to minimise the effect of their presence on his client. [26] He accepts that he stopped in front of Mr JD and while acknowledging that he had an interest in the matter told him that he did not want Mr JD to enter into his life or be watching his premises. He denies however that he spoke with the degree of aggressiveness and lack of control described by Mr JD. [27] Mr RU advised that he has spent...

10. LCRO 236-2015 DZ v EY [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...application and every affidavit filed with it complies with the requirements of the Act and these rules; and (b) that the order sought is one that ought to be made. [25] FCR r 308(5) says that the “lawyer is responsible to the court in respect of the matters referred to” in (a) and (b) above. [26] In addition to the lawyer’s duty to the Court in FCR r 308, r 2.5 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules) says: 6 A law...