Search Results

1. Fisher v Potroz - Mohakatino Parininihi No 1C West 3A2 (2016) 361 Aotea MB 146 (361 AOT 146) [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...land? (f) What further steps are necessary? Procedural history [6] Subsequent to my decision dismissing the rehearing, a Deputy Registrar’s report was completed setting out the title and ownership history of the land, and identifying various matters arising from that research. The report concluded that the order for determination of ownership per s 18(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 was correct, and the succession order to Kereni Wetini issued in 1945 had incorrectly in...

2. LCRO 53/2020 YJ v GK (22 April 2021) [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...or withdrawal of any shareholder, the remaining two shareholders (Mr DQ’s parents being treated as one shareholder) would each have the opportunity to acquire 50% of the shares in the company. [27] The remaining terms of the ‘draft’ were matters which would normally be included in a company resolution rather than a shareholders’ agreement and included the structure of the borrowing7 to be undertaken by the company. [28] On 18 March 2010, Mr GK emailed what he refers to a...

3. LCRO 20/2017 AP v RE (20 December 2018) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...complaint to the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) about Mr W’s fees. [12] Mr RE filed memoranda in the High Court in relation to the notices of claim and related child support issues. These memoranda addressed matters that had been raised by Ms Z through her lawyer. [13] In October 2015, Mr AP and Ms Z settled all issues between them. 3 [14] In July 2016 Mr RE filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal to recover his unpaid fees. Mr AP filed a...

4. Linney v Hart [pdf, 89 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 1083 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of adjudication BETWEEN GILLIAN ELIZABETH LINNEY AND EDWARD LINNEY Claimant AND GREG HART First Respondent AND No Second Respondent Malcolm MacMillan having been struck out AND No Third Respondent Andrew Lusty having been struck out AND No Fourth Respondent the (Attorney General) DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & HOUSING ( formerly BUILDING INDUST...

5. MacDonald v Wynyard - Manawakore C1 and Manawakore D (2016) 131 Taitokerau MB 149 (131 TTK 149) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...may provide a challenging environment, such issues are not uncommon amongst trustees particularly with respect to Marae. [81] There are also processes set out in the Act, and the Maori Reservation Regulations, which are designed to resolve such matters. If the trustees are unable to make decisions by consensus, they can put the issue to a vote and determine it by majority. These processes are simple and effective and are designed to allow the trustees to make decisions and move...

6. LCRO 200/2020 SK and WP v AQ (27 October 2023) [pdf, 292 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 128 Ref: LCRO 200/2020 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN SK and WP Applicants AND AQ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been anonymised Introduction [1] The applicants,

7. Te Manutukutuku Issue 35 [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   ...claims, and land vested in State enterprises in the area. The Tribunal is hopeful that a mutually satisfactory set­ tlement will be reached without undue delay. If at any stage the parties are unable to reach agreement on the whole or any part of the matters in issue, the Tribunal is able to hear the question of remedies and make appropriate recommendations. The report can be obtained from: GP Publications POBox 12052, Wellington Tel: 04-473-7218 Freefax: 0800-804-454 Whiringa...

8. Ward v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of deemed cover) [2024] NZACC 173 (31 October 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...that this decision has any relevance to the consideration of issues in this case. [38] Mr Dixon-McIver also seeks to put material sourced from ChatGPT before the Court. He contends that this material would be of assistance to the Court as to matters to be considered by the Corporation and its advisors investigating Mr Ward’s claim for cover. While I acknowledge Mr Dixon-McIver’s efforts to assist the Court, I do not find this material to be helpful. As well as the obvious di...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 48 Clear v Waikato DHB [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...the midwives and that other improvements would follow. [10] In the second (April 2001) complaint Ms Clear said that the position had not improved. She referred to what she described as Ms Parata‟s belittling conduct. Ms Clear discussed the matters with Mr Campbell. She said he was supportive. Mr Campbell spoke to Ms Parata again. After this, Ms Clear noticed an initial improvement but she said that this was short lived. [11] The third (May 2002) complaint was dealt with...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 42 ITE v ALA [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...that he had done so because the information belonged to other organisations which were involved in the shared services project and deletion was necessary to protect their interests. [3] The parties attended mediation in an effort to resolve matters and settlement was reached. One of the terms of settlement 1 was that the plaintiff’s employment would come to an end on an agreed basis, namely by reason of redundancy. The agreement was signed off by a mediator pursuant to s 149...