Search Results

1. BORA Search and Surveillance Bill [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omission...

2. BORA Crimes (Reasonable Parental Control and Correction) Amendment Bill [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter.

3. BORA Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omission...

4. Taufa v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Entitlement) [2023] NZACC 154 [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...injury was a serious injury that prevented the appellant continuing with the work that he had been doing. [47] Mr Crabb also notes that over two months elapsed between the accident on 29 March 2019 and the MRI of 4 June 2019. [48] He notes that Justice Whata in YZ v ACC3 acknowledged that reference may be made to scientific publications. Decision [49] Section 117 of the Accident Compensation Act provides that the Corporation may suspend or cancel an entitlement if it is not sati...

5. Orsborn v CAC 20006 & Collier & JVL Prestige Realty Ltd[2013] NZREADT 69 [pdf, 72 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 69 READT 028/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN SIMON AND JADE ORSBORN Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20006) First respondent AND WARWICK COLLIER and J.V.L. PRESTIGE REALTY LTD Second respondents MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member INTERI...

6. EMPC speech GUEST LECTURE Privacy Employment Interface delivered in June 2016 [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...before the Human Rights Review Tribunal. The Privacy Act also contemplates situations where the complaint may be more properly dealt with elsewhere, and includes a referral mechanism to enable this to occur.14 There is no ability to refer such matters to the Employment Court. An individual (as an employee) may pursue a personal grievance against his/her employer in circumstances where the employee has been unjustifiably dismissed or disadvantaged in their employment.15 The emplo...

7. Te Kani - Mangatawa No 9B, No3B, No 2B Block (2020) 201 Waikato Maniapoto MB 168 (201 WMN 168)) [pdf, 359 KB]

   ...WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato-Maniapoto District A20190002412 WĀHANGA Under Sections 237 & 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 and Section 72, Trustee Act 1956 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Mangatawa No 9B, No 3B, No 2B Block I WAENGA I A Between TE TIMATANGA NEIL TE KANI, TAIA HONIANA, PARAONE PIRIKA, TAHI AITKEN, CAINE RARORA TAIAPA, ANETA TE MIRIARANGI HEKE as trustees of MANGATAWA 9 B, NO 3 B, N...

8. [2023] NZREADT 19 - NQ v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 2104) (9 August 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...Committee. He chose not to make any substantive submissions on penalty, but merely to set out what he sought from the process. [103] The submissions process followed by the Committee was proper. It complied with the requirements of natural justice. [104] We also agree with the penalty imposed by the Committee for the same reasons as the Committee. Mr Boswell’s breach of r 6.4 was unintentional low-level offending. He has no disciplinary record. There is no evidence of los...

9. M D Cottle Family Trust & Ors v Barnett [2015] NZREADT 57 [pdf, 256 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 57 READT 019/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN M D COTTLE FAMILY TRUST and McBRIDE STREET CARS LTD Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND TIMOTHY BARNETT of Dunedin, Real Estate Agent Second respondent READT 020/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Ag...

10. Te Amo v Nicholas - Te Whaiti Nui A Toi Block (2020) 233 Waiariki MB 92 (233 WAR 93) [pdf, 387 KB]

    ...owners of the building. [35] Although common law provides that the owners of the land own any fixtures, s 18(l)(a) enables the Court to recognise that one or more of the owners may separately own a particular improvement. In determining these matters the Court has equitable jurisdiction and may recognise constructive trusts. [36] The Māori Appellate Court has expressed differing views as to the effect of a s 18(1)(a) order, in particular whether, on making the order, a house remai...