Burns v Argon Construction Ltd [pdf, 42 KB]
...would determine the issue of whether this claim could be amended as part of this decision. The respondents opposed any amendment. [29] Mr Carden acknowledges the history of delays by the claimants but submits that it is in the interest of justice that the matter be fully explored. He suggests that the claimants should not be disadvantaged by any faults on the part of earlier counsel. [30] I do not consider that this submission has any merit. I am satisfied that the cla...