Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8020 items matching your search terms

  1. Waitangi Tribunal - The Whanganui district [pdf, 1.6 MB]

    ...concerns and ‘repudiation’ 38; The Murimotu–Rangipo district 39; An end to the conflict 48 Chapter 5: The Late Nineteenth Century 51 Kemp’s trust 51; A new resident magistrate 53; Government pressure 55; The main trunk railway 59; ‘A matter of history’ 61; Land purchases increase 63; Tongariro National Park 67; The 1880s 68 Chapter 6: The Stout–Ngata Commission 71 Commission established 71; District divided into four areas 71; The Rangiwaea block 74; The Native Lan...

  2. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

    ...164 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20190007225 WĀHANGA Under Sections 18(1)(i), 237 and 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Part 3 Lot Deposited Plan 3020 and Section 2 Survey Office Plan 339948 and Others (Shelly Bay) I WAENGA I A Between MIKE TE WHAREHURU GILBERT, MARTHA HINEONE GLIBERT, KAREN MARAMA PARATA, MABEL URU TANIRAU AND ROGAN R...

  3. [2015] NZEmpC 58 Hoff v The Wood Lifecare (2007) Limited Industries [pdf, 177 KB]

    DEBORAH HOFF v THE WOOD LIFECARE (2007) LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 58 [6 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 58 CRC 19/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DEBORAH HOFF Plaintiff AND THE WOOD LIFECARE (2007) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 29, 30 September, 1, 2 and 3 October 2014 and 20, 21, 22 and 23 January 2015) (Heard at N

  4. LCRO 161/2020 SE v GR (31 March 2021) [pdf, 305 KB]

    ...attendances. Three days later, on 3 June 2014, Mr GR’s firm ([Law Firm 1]) acquired [Law Firm 2]’s [City A] office prior to which [Law Firm 2] had asked (by letter) its clients, including Ms SE, whether they wished [Law Firm 1] to complete current matters. [6] From that time until October 2014 Mr GR was the firm’s supervising partner for Ms SE’s purchase. He says he noticed the vendor did not own the land of which the property formed part, and on 20 June 2014 raised this an...

  5. NZ Law Commission review of the law of Trusts [pdf, 2.4 MB]

    REVIEW OF THE LAW OF TRUSTS November 2010, Wellington, New Zealand | R E P O R T 1 1 9 A TRUSTS ACT FOR NEW ZEALAND August 2013, Wellington, New Zealand | R E P O R T 1 3 0 E31(130) August 2013, Wellington, New Zealand | REPORT 130 REVIEW OF THE LAW OF TRUSTS A TRUSTS ACT FOR NEW ZEALAND The Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand

  6. Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority [2013] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...Chairperson consolidated the two proceedings pursuant to Regulation 16(1) of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002: [4] The two statements of claim bear strong similarities, many of the paragraphs being identically worded. It is clear that the matters complained of arise out of the same factual matrix. Because the proceedings are closely related a consolidation order is required under Regulation 16(1) of the Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002. I am satisfied that...

  7. [2016] NZEmpC 97 Banks v Hockey Manawatu Inc [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...with an application for costs which follows a judgment delivered by his Honour Judge A D Ford on 21 March 2016, 1 as well as a challenge to a costs determination issued by the Employment Relations Authority. 2 I am dealing with both of these matters due to Judge Ford’s recent retirement. [2] In its substantive decision, the Court concluded that Mr Banks had been unjustifiably dismissed on many grounds; the process failures were described as

  8. Emtage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC166 [pdf, 288 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 166 ACR 124/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN SOUTHERN TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED Applicant AND NICOLA EMTAGE First Respondent AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Second Respondent Submissions: N McAllister for the Applicant P O’Sullivan for the Fi...

  9. Mehrtens v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation, Suspension) [2023] NZACC 8 [pdf, 287 KB]

    ...made it clear he considers the symptoms indicated the applicant had suffered a traumatic brain injury in her initial accident on 17 March 2016 and continued to suffer its effect at the time of his assessment. He submits that Dr Xiong’s opinion matters. As he pointed out, he is a specialist in such injuries and succeeded Professor MacLeod as Director of the Burwood Hospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Service. He has more than 20 years experience in working in brain and concussi...

  10. LCRO 175/2022 OP v VN (10 October 2023) [pdf, 315 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2023] NZLCRO 118 Ref: LCRO 175/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN OP Applicant AND VN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr OP has applie