Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 124 Skyline Enterprises Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC124 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a direct referral under section 87D of the Act SKYLINE ENTERPRISES LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-107) Applicant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Consent Authority Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner W R Howie Environment Commissioner C J Wilkinson Hearing: at Queenstown on 22, 23, 24 and 25 May 2017 Appearances: G T

2. [2018] NZEnvC 178 The Friends of Sherwood Trust & Ngati Paoa Trust Board v The Chief Executive of the Auckland Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ............................................... 34 Undertakings as to damages (s 320(3)(b) RMA) ...................................................... 37 Whether the parties should be heard (s 320(3)(c) RMA) .......................................... 38 Other matters (s 320(3)(d) RMA) .............................................................................. 38 Apparent breaches of other legal obligations ............................................................... 42 Discretion o...

3. [2021] NZACC 81 - Goodwin v ACC (15 June 2021) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...make it clear that there needs to be evidence that a discrete injury occurred including for example the evidence of a sprain or physical strain. This is consistent with ACC v Studman9 where the issue was the identification of a personal injury. Justice Ellis found it was necessary to precisely identify the underlying personal injury in order to know whether cover for a treatment injury exists. [46] The respondent referred for the need to establish causation referring to ACC v Amb...

4. 1.-Full-List-of-Fee-Changes-23-July.pdf [pdf, 366 KB]

   Ministry of Justice fee changes List of fee changes for Courts, Tribunals, Collection Services and Criminal Records Checks. New fees will take effect from 1 July 2024 unless stated otherwise. V4 Contents Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Court fees ....

5. LCRO 43/2019 KD v MX (19 February 2021) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...contact/Next of Kin • Email me details of school events, newsletters, field trips, progress reports, etc. • Notify me of significant occurrences e.g. if he hurts [him]self, adjustment issues, etc. • Parent volunteer opportunities. • Any other matters a parent should know of his/her child’s time at your school. • I would also like to periodically contact you or his teacher to have a chat about his progress and time at your school. If I were in [city 1] I will be doin...

6. LCRO 72/2020 ZW v CB (29 September 2020) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...(u) engaged in multiple discussions and correspondence with parties against whom Mr ZW was seeking to recover losses, and (v) considered potential mediators; and (w) prepared a draft statement of claim for mediation, and (x) dealt with all matters arising from the IFSO complaint; and (y) held discussions with IFSO; and (z) prepared a second claim to IFSO. [18] In providing an account of the steps that had been taken on the file, Mr CB also explained the responses provided when...

7. RB v CG LCRO 117/2013 (30 June 2014) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...[child], and to resolve the division of relationship property between her and her former husband. [2] A temporary protection order was granted in [mid] 2007, and made final in [late] 2007. [3] Ms CG acted for Ms RB on the relationship property matter until it was resolved by consent in 2010, but care and guardianship disputes continue. [4] In order to make arrangements with respect to their [child]’s care after they had separated and before they finalised the proceeding ov...

8. [2020] NZIACDT 45 - TTD v Zheng (14 October 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...agreed by her before it was sent. It was his mistake not to send the letter to her for her approval before uploading it and he will learn from this mistake. [24] According to Mr Zheng, the contradictory evidence he gave to the Tribunal on two matters was due to his confusion in defending himself at the hearing. His statements were wrong but not deliberately so. [25] Mr Zheng contends that his conduct does not bear the hefty sanction of prohibition for up to 12 months as soug...

9. Dixon v Accident Compensation Corporation (Employment Status at time of Incapacity) [2023] NZACC 170 [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...refers to the High Court Judgment in Bartrom Estate2 where the High Court said: … a formulaic approach introduces inherent rigidities which cannot be cured by purposive judicial interpretation. It is not for the Courts to resolve problems or injustices that flow from plain language of the legislation, but rather for the legislature, if it sees fit, to amend the legislation. [45] She also refers to Humphries3 where Judge Powell found that the appellant did not come within the li...

10. [2023] NZREADT 33 - CAC 2102 v LL (4 December 2023) [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...[51] The Committee has sought an order for permanent non-publication of the name of, and any identifying features relating to, the complainant. [52] Mr Barrowclough has applied for an order for permanent non-publication of LL’s name and of any matters likely to identify him. The Committee does not oppose the application and has indicated to the Tribunal that they will abide by the Tribunal’s decision as to non-publication of LL’s name and details. [53] The starting point fo...