Search Results

1. RB v CG LCRO 117/2013 (30 June 2014) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...[child], and to resolve the division of relationship property between her and her former husband. [2] A temporary protection order was granted in [mid] 2007, and made final in [late] 2007. [3] Ms CG acted for Ms RB on the relationship property matter until it was resolved by consent in 2010, but care and guardianship disputes continue. [4] In order to make arrangements with respect to their [child]’s care after they had separated and before they finalised the proceeding ov...

2. [2020] NZIACDT 45 - TTD v Zheng (14 October 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...agreed by her before it was sent. It was his mistake not to send the letter to her for her approval before uploading it and he will learn from this mistake. [24] According to Mr Zheng, the contradictory evidence he gave to the Tribunal on two matters was due to his confusion in defending himself at the hearing. His statements were wrong but not deliberately so. [25] Mr Zheng contends that his conduct does not bear the hefty sanction of prohibition for up to 12 months as soug...

3. Dixon v Accident Compensation Corporation (Employment Status at time of Incapacity) [2023] NZACC 170 [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...refers to the High Court Judgment in Bartrom Estate2 where the High Court said: … a formulaic approach introduces inherent rigidities which cannot be cured by purposive judicial interpretation. It is not for the Courts to resolve problems or injustices that flow from plain language of the legislation, but rather for the legislature, if it sees fit, to amend the legislation. [45] She also refers to Humphries3 where Judge Powell found that the appellant did not come within the li...

4. [2023] NZREADT 33 - CAC 2102 v LL (4 December 2023) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...[51] The Committee has sought an order for permanent non-publication of the name of, and any identifying features relating to, the complainant. [52] Mr Barrowclough has applied for an order for permanent non-publication of LL’s name and of any matters likely to identify him. The Committee does not oppose the application and has indicated to the Tribunal that they will abide by the Tribunal’s decision as to non-publication of LL’s name and details. [53] The starting point fo...

5. [2025] NZACC 064 - Agar v Accident Compensation Corporation (23 April 2025) [pdf, 180 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT HAMILTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 064 ACAR 103/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN FRANCES AGAR Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 April 2025 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriro District Court Appearances: A Carlyle for the Appellant I Hunt for the Accident Compensation Corpora...

6. Ward v Maccol Developments Ltd [pdf, 194 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00823 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN PETER LOMAS WARD and HEATHER JOY WARD Claimants AND MACCOL DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED First respondent AND MARK JOSEPH COLLINSON Second respondent AND NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL Third respondent DETERMINATION CLAIM NO.00823 – WARD DETERMINATION.doc 2 INDEX INTRODUCTION

7. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Hawkes Bay [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT lIB HAWKE'S BAY DEAN COWIE SEPTEMBER 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 1: Auckland, R Daamen, P Ramer, and B Rigby District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 9: The Whanganui District, S Cross and B Bargh District l1A: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 12: The Wellington District, Dr R Anderson and K Pickens District 13: The Nor

8. LCRO 180/2022 HB v UC and JW (26 November 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...not shown that he has suffered any loss.” Mr HB’s comments in reply11 [20] Mr MG responded on behalf of Mr HB. He says that Mr HB does not accept that the retainer was limited in any way, and that [Law Firm A] were retained to attend to all matters connected with the purchase of the property and the terms of the agreement. [21] Mr HB does not recall signing any documentation to transfer the warranty and concludes “that either the Halo guarantee transferred automatically, or th...

9. Mota v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed cover decision) [2025] NZACC 47 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 342 KB]

   ...entitlements, not primary cover. Mr Rangiwhetu filled out and signed an entitlement form but did not specify attendant care as an entitlement he wanted. Subsequently a note of a telephone conversation with a social worker refers to attendant care. Justice Mallon found it was inequitable, on the basis of a strict approach to the form required for Mr Rangiwhetu to be denied entitlements. [99] The circumstances in this case are not the same. Neither of the two 15 July documents ar...

10. Faulkner v Deputy Registrar - Allotment 5 Parish of Tahawai [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 643 (2010 APPEAL 643) [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...December 2010 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 643 (2010 APPEAL 643) A20090002450 UNDER Sections 58, 129 and 131, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Allotment 5 Parish of Tahawai BETWEEN TOA HAERE FAULKNER Appellant AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR Respondent AND TRUSTEES OF ALLOTMENT 5 PARISH OF TAHAWAI First Interested Party AND WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COU...