Search Results

1. AD v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 118 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...reflects the likely costs of incapacity for the self- employed person having regard to— (a) an estimate of the person’s income, net of business costs; and (b) an estimate of the cost of any required replacement labour; and (c) such other matters as may be relevant to the particular case. (2) The amount determined under subsection (1) must not be— 8 (a) less than 80% of the amount of weekly earnings specified in clause 42(3) of Schedule 1; or (b) more than the max...

2. LR v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 109 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 109 ACR 166/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN LR Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: J Carrigan for the A...

3. RA v LZ LCRO 2 / 2011 (22 August 2012) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...BETWEEN RA and RB of Christchurch Applicant AND LZ of Rangiora Respondent DECISION Background [1] The full background to this matter is set out in the Standards Committee decision, and covers in detail the matters comprising the complaint made by Mr RA against Mr LZ (the Practitioner). It is a thorough and well-written decision and runs to some 15 pages. The following is a brief overview to provide a backdrop of the complaints and the discuss...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 108 Dromgool v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   ...the land of the objector to be taken: (e) prepare a written report on the objection and on the court's findings: (f) submit its report and findings to the Minister or local authority, as the case may require. [6] In order to understand the matters before this Court, it is necessary to traverse both the factual background and, subsequently, the background to this appeal process. Factual Background [7] In 2012 TEL acquired the 11 OV transmission line between Kaikohe and Kaitaia,...

5. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 86 (437 AOT 86) [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20180004434 A20180004854 A20180006936 WĀHANGA Under Sections 43, 19(1)(a), (b), (c), 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block I WAENGA I A Between PHILLIP TAUEKI AND CHARLES RUDD Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And JONATHAN PROCTER, MATHEW SWORD, MAROKOPA MATAKATEA, ROBERT WARRINGTON, KELLY TAHIWI, KERI T...

6. Ryan v CAC 20002 & Skinner [2013] NZREADT 45 [pdf, 67 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 45 READT 040/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN LEE RYAN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND FRASER SKINNER Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member HEARD at QUEENSTOWN on 19 February 2013 (with subse...

7. LCRO 20/2020 WD and FJ v EG, SN and PL (7 April 2022) [pdf, 354 KB]

   ...conveyancing transaction were followed, and how subsequent concerns about the management of that transaction were dealt with. [5] That brief description is not to be taken as trivialising the complaint and review application. I acknowledge that the matters raised by the complainants have been a source of real distress to them which continues to this day, some four to five years after the events themselves. [6] That being said, I also acknowledge that, for the practitioners, the dis...

8. IK v VR LCRO 227/2014 (21 December 2015) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...facts as the complaints referred to in paragraph [1] above. Separate Standards Committee decisions followed the fees complaint and the IK complaint; those decisions are the subject of separate applications for review and Mr AW is acting in those matters also. [6] This review is confined to the Standards Committee decision with the identifying number 7854; that is to say the prosecution decision and the unsatisfactory conduct finding in relation to the terms of engagement complaint. Ba...

9. [2009] NZEmpC AC 19/09 Gilbert v The Attorney-General in respect of the CE of Department of Corrections [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...the Court recall its judgment (or part of it) on remedies and costs delivered on 4 December 2003 (AC 63/03) because of a slip or omission. That application was determined by a judgment issued on 10 March 2006 ([2006] ERNZ 1). In respect of some matters I found there was neither slip nor omission, but on others I accepted that the interests of justice required not only that the judgment be recalled in part but that there could be further actuarial evidence and submissions on those is...

10. Reid v CAC 20002 & Cox and Cox v CAC 20002 & Reid [2013] NZREADT 68 [pdf, 61 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 68 READT 073/12 and 082/12 IN THE MATTER OF two appeals under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN JOHN REID (073/12) Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC20002 ) First respondent AND DANIEL COX Second respondent BETWEEN DANIEL COX (082/12) Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20002) First respondent AND JOHN REID Secon...