Search Results

1. Chalecki v Accident Compensation Corporation (Entitlement to Vocational Rehabilitation Costs, Decision Capable of Review) [2023] NZACC 88 [pdf, 297 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 88 ACR 87/22 ACR 102/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN EDMOND CHALECKI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 4 April 2023 Heard at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: The Appellant in person Mr I Hunt for the Respondent Judgment:...

2. LCRO 84/2020 WF v BP (11 June 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...the Government had announced its decision to move to a COVID-19 level 4 alert, that to commence 2 days after the announcement; and (d) following the Government announcement, his sole focus was on attending to his clients’ interests and staff matters; and (e) a judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court,12 supported his argument that service by e-mail could be problematic. 12 Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12. 7 [4...

3. Te Manutukutuku Issue 39 [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   ...investigate library administrative procedures. Michelle will compare these results with people's interview responses and recommend future options for managing information. Michelle's previous library work has been at the Department of Justice as Law Librarian, and at Te Puni Kokiri as Database Development Librarian. She has Scottish and Eng­ lish ancestry and grew up in Tau­ marunui and Hamilton. Michelle completed a Master of Arts (Hons) concentrating on New Zealand Li...

4. Watson v Day - Torere Section 64 (2024) 310 Waiariki MB 227 (310 WAR 227) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP20230009027 AP-20230000023550 WĀHANGA Under Sections 269(4) and 281, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Torere Section 64 I WAENGA I A Between GARY MAX WATSON Te kaitono Applicant ME And BRENT DAY, DAVID PETERS, JACK MIHAERE, KRIONE MAIKA, MAURICE WILLIAMS, RUSSELL MIO AND TAU REWHAREWHA THE COMMITTEE...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 96 South Pacific Meats Ltd v Mohammed [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...shift. Mr Hamilton said that he considered that Mr Mohammed had effectively abandoned his employment. However, this stands in contrast with the advice given at the conclusion of the 6 August meeting that Mr Mohammed would take time to reflect on matters before making a decision. Mr Hamilton did not make any attempt to contact Mr Mohammed and/or his representative to ascertain Mr Mohammed’s position on the offer that had been made to him, despite being aware that Mr Mohammed was...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 129 Maharaj v Wesley Wellington Mission Inc [pdf, 155 KB]

   ASHISH MAHARAJ v WESLEY WELLINGTON MISSION INCORPORATED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 129 [27 October 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 129 EMPC 110/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceedings BETWEEN ASHISH MAHARAJ Plaintiff AND WESLEY WELLINGTON MISSION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 7...

7. LCRO 173/2021 KC v TG (6 May 2022) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...gave Mr TG a copy of his terms of engagement. Included amongst the terms was the requirement for an initial retainer of $2,000 (which Mr TG paid). [13] As well, the terms described the legal work as being “employment dispute and associated matters” and advised that fees would be charged “based on time and attendance plus GST, office expenses and disbursements”. [14] Mr KC’s hourly rate, as a partner in [Law Firm A], was described in the terms of engagement as being betw...

8. [2020] NZEnvC 126 Beresford v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...Attorney considers that rezoning may help unlock the land (currently landlocked) and give the future owners better options “to utilise and maximise this redress land which has become surrounded by residential development”. Those, of course, are matters for determination in due course. [14] The Attorney readily qualifies under s274(1)(c) in “representing a relevant aspect of the public interest”. I accept the explanation of these matters in his s274 notice.10 It explain...

9. [2007] NZEmpC AC 57/07 CE of the Department of Corrections v Imo [pdf, 92 KB]

   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS V IMO AK AC 57/07 14 November 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 57/07 ARC 24/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Plaintiff AND GEORGE IMO Defendant Hearing: 10 and 11 September 2007 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Katie Elkin and Nick Belton, Counsel for the Plaintiff Bryce Quarrie,...

10. Maori Incorporations Factsheet.pdf [pdf, 370 KB]

    MĀORI INCORPORATIONS Te Kooti Whenua Māori – Māori Land Court For more information, go to maorilandcourt.govt.nz Te Kooti Whenua Māori – Māori Land Court (MLC) is the New Zealand Court that hears matters relating to Māori land. The unique relationship between Māori and whenua is recognised by the MLC, and the records held by the Court form an invaluable part of the whakapapa of all Māori people. The MLC operates under the provisions of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (‘the...