Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 3 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 13 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 3 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

2. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (Privacy Act) [2020] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 353 KB]

   ...Services in its provision of the following documents to the Marshalls: [78.1] An audit undertaken by its health advisor. [78.2] A file note dated 18 April 2016. [78.3] File notes made between 10 December 2015 and 18 December 2015. Ancillary Matters [79] While we have found an interference with Eamon’s privacy, for the sake of completeness we briefly canvass three additional matters: [79.1] Whether, in relation to information IDEA Services said on 29 June 2016 was not readily re...

3. Rātima v Sullivan - Tataraakina C (2019) 79 Tākitimu MB 103 (79 TKT 103) [pdf, 488 KB]

   ...indeed has a legislative mandate to adopt informality per s 66 of the Act, the proper dignity of the proceedings needs to be maintained at all times. Litigation is a serious procedure and the rights of parties affected by legal claims to natural justice and a fair and transparent proceeding remains paramount. [74] In addition, it should also be remembered that, strictly speaking, a party needs standing to be heard. In other words, a legitimate and valid right at law to be notified...

4. Arthur v Accident Compensation Corporation (Vocational Independence) [2023] NZACC 36 [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...compression, cubicle tunnel syndrome and biceps tendinosis, but now advising that the Corporation was revoking deemed cover for those conditions. [65] In October 2022, Dr Paul Timmings, Neurologist, provided a report in relation to other claim matters, and confirmed Mr Arthur’s primary and ongoing difficulty with his right arm pain, which is dysaesthetic, and hyperalgesic, causing him to have difficulty using the hand or arm for more than a few minutes at a time. Dr Timmings di...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 60 FGH v RST [pdf, 720 KB]

   ...Ms H has established a disadvantage grievance on three grounds. Because insufficient evidence and submissions have been placed before the Court as to remedies, I have concluded that it will be necessary to resume the hearing to consider those matters. Issues [9] Ms H’s statement of claim sets out the various legislative and contractual provisions which are said to be relevant, to which I shall return later, and summarises the relevant chronology. [10] Then it is asserted...

6. L v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...tribunal to make a judgment under the civil standard of proof; the balance of probabilities. The "balance of probabilities" means what is alleged is more likely than not to have occurred. However, fraud is also a criminal issue, and criminal matters are judged to a higher standard of proof; they need to be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. There was historically much debate on the approach to be taken. This was resolved in the case of Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Commi...

7. Elhassan v Webby [2022] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 313 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 018/2018 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN TARIG ELHASSAN PLAINTIFF AND JUDITH WEBBY (CASTLE) DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms J Foster, Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr IR Nemani, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr J Suyker for plaintiff Ms J Webby in person (absent and did not participate in the hearing) DATE OF HEARING: 1 July 2020 DATE OF DECISION: 5 August 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 [1] Mr E

8. [2011] NZEmpC 1 Gyenge v Clifford Lamar Limited [pdf, 221 KB]

   EMMA GYENGE V CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEMPC 1 [10 January 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEMPC 1 ARC 65/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN EMMA GYENGE Plaintiff AND CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 November 2010 11 November 2010 22 November 2010 Appearances: Jan Gyenge, Agent for Plaintiff Clifford Harris, Agent for Defendant Ju

9. [2018] NZEmpC 79 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 513 KB]

   PAUL HINES v EASTLAND PORT LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 79 [16 July 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 79 EMPC 14/2018 EMPC 47/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PAUL HINES Plaintiff AND EASTLAND PORT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 March, 4 April, 9-13 April and 24 April 2018 (heard at Auckland, Wellington and Gisborne) Appearances:

10. Witana v Tau - Omapere Taraire E (2019) 191 Taitokerau MB 1 (191 TTK 1) [pdf, 535 KB]

    191 Taitokerau MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT UNDER Sections 67, 236, 237, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Omapere Taraire E & Rangihamama X3A Ahu Whenua Trust BETWEEN A20180002924 RACHEL WITANA and TAOKO WIHONGI Applicants AND RANIERA SONNY TAU, TE TUHI ROBUST, BRUCE CUTFORTH and COLLEEN BERMINGHAM-BROWN Respondents A20180002884 AND BETW...