LCRO 104/2016 and LCRO 192/2016 LP v PR (27 June 2019) [pdf, 223 KB]
...was also actively involved in the appeal. Although it seems most of the instructions came directly from Mr DJ, Mr LP acknowledged in correspondence to [Law firm A] dated 3 December 2009, that Mrs YL was “looking after the relationship property matters for [the Trust]”.4 It is assumed that excludes any areas of conflict between the interests of Mr DJ and the Trust. [14] Having secured leave to appeal and call fresh evidence, Ms AW raised arguments over discovery of Trust files....