Search Results

1. Cooper v Wellington City Council [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...conference set down the procedures for the adjudication process and timetabling. 1.7 There were 20 Procedural Orders issued during the interlocutory proceedings which dealt with applications for removal and joinder of parties, timetabling matters and the like. 1.8 The Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Respondents were removed from the adjudication proceedings during the interlocutory period. 3 Claim 2171:Determination 1.9 Mediation was attempted during the period of the...

2. ENVC Matiatia transcript notice of motion 20150326 [pdf, 478 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2013-AKL-000174 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal pursuant to s87 of Resource Management Act 1991 BY WAIHEKE MARINAS LIMITED Applicant Notice of Motion by Direction Matiatia Inc. seeking order that amended application is “out of scope” Hearing Commenced: 26 March 2015 Court: Judge L Newhook Commissioner A Leijnen Commissioner R Howie Appearances: Mr R Brabant and Mr J Brabant for the Appel

3. Wihelmus Hooft van Huijsduijnen v Woodley [2012] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 451 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000028 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN RONALD ALOYSIUS WIHELMUS AND MARTINA HELENA MARIA HOOFT VAN HUIJSDUIJNEN Claimants AND EDWARD MERVYN JOHN AND LYNETTE ANNE CATHERINE WOODLEY First Respondents AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND ALAN GORDON MINTY (Removed) Third Respondent AND SAWREY CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND DONALD JOHN HAWINKELS Fifth Respo

4. Ngati Pahauwera Crown Summary Report November 2014 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Summary Report of Information Relevant to the Ngāti Pāhauwera CMT and PCR application under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 November 2014 Ministry of Justice NOT LEGAL ADVICE OR GOVERNMENT POLICY 2 Contents Preface ..........................................................................................................................................................4

5. Abyaneh v Auckland City Council [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...liable to make a payment takes no steps to pay the amount ordered the claimant can take steps to enforce this determination in accordance with law. This can include making an application for enforcement through the Collections Unit of the Ministry of Justice for payment of the full amount for which the party has been found jointly liable to pay. In addition one respondent may be able to seek contribution from other respondents in accordance with the terms of the determination. There...

6. Singh v Ryan - [2019] NZIACDT 76 (8 November 2019) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...was given. Department of Corrections’ evidence to investigator [78] As Mr Ryan had advised Immigration New Zealand that two of the visa clients had worked on prison software for Bite Consulting NZ/BC International’s client, the Ministry of Justice and Corrections, the Authority’s investigator made enquiries of the Department of Corrections. [79] The Department advised the Authority’s investigator on 10 May 2019 that it was not aware of any formal procurement set up with BI...

7. [2022] NZACC 45 – Williams v ACC (22 March 2022) [pdf, 451 KB]

   ...Chiropractic has been associated with an increasein his tolerance to movement of his neck. [130] However, the appellant adds that chiropractic has been associated with an increase in his tolerance to movement of his neck. [131] As Her Honour Justice Ellis said in ACC v Studman:3 [26] … Although pain and stiffness may well be symptomatic of an underlying (and potentially qualifying) physical injury, that is not necessarily so. Most obviously, I suppose pain could just as easi...

8. Pilbrow & Anor as Trustees of the Pilbrow Family Trust v Moorhead [2011] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 352 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000059 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 31 BETWEEN OWEN IVOR MAUL PILBROW and JOAN GWENDOLINE PILBROW as Trustees of the PILBROW FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND HUGH CHARLES MOORHEAD and BARBARA MARY MOORHEAD First Respondents AND CRAVEN BUILDERS LIMITED Second Respondent AND EUROPLAST FINISHES LIMITED Third Respondent AND LANCE CLARK Fourth Respondent AND DAVID TAYLOR Fifth Respondent AND GIANNI MA

9. KI v Accident Compensation Corporation (Contribution to Cost of Treatment) [2024] NZACC 011 [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...opinions across a decade or so. • Whilst I broadly disagree with some of Dr Newburn’s approaches here, the picture does not seem entirely clear to me and the review panel, in my view, overstated the degree with which we can be certain on the matters in dispute. • Some caveats and acknowledgement of the complexity of this case and recognition that even the review panel may be incorrect, would better reflect the difficulties we will always have with uncertainty in this case....

10. Easton v Mayers [pdf, 298 KB]

    ...signatory to the record of the experts’ conference I do not accept his evidence as being that of an expert in relation to any of the issues put to the experts’ conference. Even if Mr Ruffell does have the required expertise to comment on these matters, to admit his evidence would allow the Council to circumvent the purpose of the experts’ conference which is to deal efficiently and expeditiously with any disputed expert evidence. The Council therefore relied on the evidence...