8497 items matching your search terms
[2020] NZSSAA 4 Reference No. SAA 26/17 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee DECISION Background [1] In 1993 XXXX and his wife went to Singapore as missionaries, where they lived and worked for about 19 years. After packing up and leaving
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 180 ACR 304/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN LESLEY NORMAN AUSTIN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Mr G J Thwaite for the Applicant Ms...
...one of unsatisfactory conduct in his professional capacity. [2] The misconduct charge listed eight particulars, and the unsatisfactory conduct charge, one particular. In respect of the misconduct charge the first five particulars related to matters associated with a property purchase and loan regarding a client of Mr Parlane’s, a Mrs R. The remaining three particulars in the misconduct charge alleged that Mr Parlane had behaved in an unprofessional and belligerent manner,...
...stated that she had been insistent that Mr BG’s wife not attend the January meetings. (c) Ms HL had specifically discussed his case with his wife, and had recommended that she meet with a victim advisor. (d) Ms HL had guided his wife as to the matters that she should address with the victim advisor. (e) The Standards Committee had failed to adequately consider his evidence. [15] Ms HL was invited to comment on Mr BG’s review application. [16] She submitted that:2 (a) Mr...
...asks that the Committee’s decision stand, and Mr and Mrs N’s application be dismissed. (1) Acting in a professional, or personal capacity [37] Mr VO agrees with the Committee that the issues he and Mrs VO have with Mr and Mrs N are civil matters in respect of which the Committee declined jurisdiction. [38] Mr VO refers to “a very long history of correspondence” between him and Mr and Mrs N in this matter. He says although “most” of the correspondence was on his lett...
...allegedly advised her orally that she was a contractor. The name of the employer, a company, was mentioned five times in the letter. [6] The letter stated that the retainer was to represent the respondent “…in connection with Disputes Tribunal matters”. [7] Two days later, the firm issued the respondent an invoice for $2,300. [8] Mr X delegated primary carriage of the work to another employed lawyer, Mr Y. The applicant was unaware of the instruction, the retainer and the dele...
...minimal half finished work would be left. Mr Hardie submitted that the evidence showed that Dr Round’s workload had not been reduced but rather “tailed off”. He submitted that the evidence showed that he had confined Dr Round’s work to matters already under way with a view to seeing them largely completed and in some cases finalised but there was no evidence that this was intended to ensure that there would be no half finished work when Dr Round came to be dismissed. [50]...
2016 Chief Judge’s MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT A20090014767 CJ 2009/56 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF John Henry Carroll BETWEEN DIANE WIKITORIA STEVENS Applicant Date: 28 January 2016 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 2 Introduction [1] This application is filed by...
JOHAN AARTS v BARNARDOS NEW ZEALAND NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 145 [1 August 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 145 ARC 14/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHAN AARTS Plaintiff AND BARNARDOS NEW ZEALAND First Defendant AND COMMISSIONER OF NEW ZEALAND POLICE Second Defendant AND MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Third Defendant...
...BILL OF RIGHTS ACT ISSUES Issues of consistency with the Bill of Rights Act arise in the following ways: Section 14 – Right to freedom of expression • Obligations in the Bill to disclose, publish and register documents, information and other matters amount to compelled expression. • Limits on advertising and publicity restrict the freedom to impart certain information. Section 18 – Right to leave New Zealand • Court orders requiring a person to deliver up to the Court the...