Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 051 Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 326 KB]

   Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 051 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND of potential appeals under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act against the decision of the Waikato Regional Council on Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan AND of applications for a waiver under section 281 of the Act to extend the timeframe for filing not...

2. Harris v Department of Corrections [2013] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...stressed that he accepted that Corrections had acted properly upon discovering the loss of the documents. He does rely, however, on the fact of the loss as evidence that documents are lost or misplaced by Corrections. [23] With these preliminary matters having been disposed of we turn now to the case presented by Mr Harris. We do not intend providing an exhaustive account of the evidence he gave over two and a half days. A general overview only is intended. THE CASE FOR MR HARRIS [...

3. NZCVS 2024 Questionnaire Cycle 7 [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   NEW ZEALAND CRIME AND VICTIMS SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE 2023–24 (YEAR 7) 1 Contents Questionnaire Interpretation .......................................................................................................................... 3 Initial Demographics ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Victimisation Screener Questions .........................................

4. LCRO 75/2017, 210/2017 and 212/2017 SW v HB (31 October 2018) [pdf, 425 KB]

   LCRO 75/2017 210/2017 212/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SW Applicant and Respondent AND HB Respondent and Applicant The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms SW and Ms HB, both of whom are lawyers, applied for

5. [2024] NZEnvC 129 Second Star Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 591 KB]

   SECOND STAR LTD v QLDC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 129 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN SECOND STAR LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-52) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner M C G Mabin Hearing: at Queenstown on 4 and 5 March 2024 Site v

6. Implementation of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 - Regulations and Codes of Practice - Discussion Document [pdf, 486 KB]

   ...This document seeks initial views on proposed requirements for reporting entities. Formal consultation for reporting entity obligations is expected in early May 2010. Any comment on this information document should be provided to the Ministry of Justice by 5pm Friday 19 March 2010, and should be sent to: Email: international.crime@justice.govt.nz Post: Attention: International Criminal Law team Ministry of Justice | Tahu o te Ture PO Box 180 Wellington 6401 Publication of submis...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 28 Maori Hill & Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd v O’Sullivan [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...The delay, he said, was caused by needing to get a Justice of the Peace to witness the documentation, which he arranged and which was deferred as not everyone was present and another person did not have her documentation. While this did delay matters, it does not explain the length of the delay that ultimately occurred. Nor does it explain the original delay of some two months in providing the enrolment forms following Ms O’Sullivan’s appointment. [14] Mr Vohora also sought to...

8. Johnson v CAC 20003 & Harvey [2016] NZREADT 68 [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...in unsatisfactory conduct. [25] In a penalty decision issued on 20 July 2015, the Committee censured Mr Harvey and imposed a fine of $7,500. The appeals [26] The grounds of appeal set out in the Johnsons’ Notice of Appeal reflect the matters raised in their complaint. In general terms, they challenge the Committee’s finding of unsatisfactory conduct. They allege that: [a] Mr Harvey represented to Mr Johnson that he would never have to settle his purchase of the secti...

9. CD and Anor v GH LCRO 98/2013 (3 August 2016) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...amount of the clients’ money being lost to them somewhere in the international banking system for a period of days.5 Undertaking and conflict of interest The lawyer was ordered to pay compensation of $2,000 for anxiety and distress in that matter. [15] Mr [EF] initially said Mr [GH] undertook to him to retain the funds, and breached that undertaking. The emphasis shifted after Mr [EF] received Mr [GH]’s response to an assertion that regardless of whether or not Mr [GH] had give...

10. Tamakehu v Te Uamairangi - Ohotu No.1C No.1 Block (2020) 414 Aotea MB 59 (414 AOT 59) [pdf, 223 KB]

    414 Aotea MB 59 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20180004432 WĀHANGA Under Section 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Ohotu No.1C No.1 Block I WAENGA I A Between JENNY TAMAKEHU, NEIL RANGINUI AND PENELOPE WIARI AS TRUSTEES OF OHOTU 1C1 RESERVATION TRUST (MATAHIWI MARAE) Ngā Kaitono Applicants ME And DARYN TE UAM...