Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8497 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 43/2016 XZ v QW [pdf, 209 KB]

    LCRO 43/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN XZ Applicant AND QW Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms XZ has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to tak

  2. Roborgh v Lay [pdf, 303 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00062 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN LYNNE ROBORGH and LEON JOHN ROBORGH Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation) Sixth Respondent AND No Seventh Respondent AND TIMOTHY

  3. LCRO 136/2021 YL v OB (28 February 2022) [pdf, 249 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 014 Ref: LCRO 136/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN YL Applicant AND OB Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Ms YL has

  4. Appendix-4-Additional-submissions.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    Sunny Kaushal | Chairman Ministerial Advisory Group - Retail Crime Ministry of Justice, Govt of New Zealand Defence of Property and Powers to Detain I am writing in response to your request for input on the proposal "Empowering Security Industry to Deal with Retail Offenders." As a security industry veteran with over four decades of experience spanning law enforcement and private security, I am pleased to offer my insights on this critical matter. Given my unique perspective bridgi...

  5. LCRO 162/2015 and 66/2016 IA v CMR (31 July 2017) [pdf, 253 KB]

    ...although the IRD’s investigations into the company affairs continued. [28] Mr IA refers to information his team unearthed evidencing alleged misdeeds by (H)’s business associates, further instructions from (H), and investigations into those matters which were still underway when Mr IA’s retainer ended. The liquidator mentioned money laundering. Mr IA refers to company claims and losses totalling over $12 million. [29] Mr IA issued invoices for his fees to Mr and Mrs CMR whic...

  6. Minute of the Environment Court (dated 17 March 2017) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under section 120 of the Act BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-047) Appellant DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent MINUTE OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT (17 March 2017) I ntrod uction [1] The purpose of this Minute is to address the directions given at the pre-hearing conference on 10 March 2017. Scope [2] Given that no party has challenged the amendment made b

  7. [2024] NZEnvC 226 Pirirakau Tribal Authority Incorporated v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 323 KB]

    ...the multivariate nature of the assessment required under the relevant provisions of the HNZTPA. There is unlikely to be a standard answer available in the face of the range of circumstances in cases such as this and the need, in the interests of justice, to assess those circumstances in terms of all the relevant matters which the HNZTPA requires to be considered. (iii) The extent to which protection of the archaeological site prevents or restricts the existing or reasonable future...

  8. Shepherd & Ors as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 288 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00939 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN MICHAEL DAVID SHEPHERD, FIONNA MOANA ANNE BELL and TODD WILLIAM HUNTER as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (

  9. [2008] NZEmpC WC 11/08 McCain Foods (NZ) Ltd v Service and Food Workers Union [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...union, its governing bodies composed of elected members, usually delegates. Delegates and other “activists” play an important role in the union’s affairs and, in practice, not only at their own work sites. Delegates represent the union in matters involving other than their own employers. This is reflected in a number of collective agreements that the union has entered into with employers, including Heinz Wattie’s, although not McCain. So, in the case of the delegates at...

  10. Leef v Leef - Panguru A47B (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 11 (113 TTK 11) [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...the whānau trust in 2006 to have stipulated a similar condition that the whānau trust build within three years, failing which the order would be cancelled. Given that nine years have passed without any building on the site, the interests of justice and of the owners may not favour the whānau trust retaining that site. [61] Second, as Richard is not an owner in the land in his own name but relies on the whānau trust’s ownership in the land, Richard’s occupation order should...