8497 items matching your search terms
T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 8 1 4 T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZREADT 69 READT 028/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN SIMON AND JADE ORSBORN Appellants AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20006) First respondent AND WARWICK COLLIER and J.V.L. PRESTIGE REALTY LTD Second respondents MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Ms N Dangen - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member INTERI...
...before the Human Rights Review Tribunal. The Privacy Act also contemplates situations where the complaint may be more properly dealt with elsewhere, and includes a referral mechanism to enable this to occur.14 There is no ability to refer such matters to the Employment Court. An individual (as an employee) may pursue a personal grievance against his/her employer in circumstances where the employee has been unjustifiably dismissed or disadvantaged in their employment.15 The emplo...
...WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato-Maniapoto District A20190002412 WĀHANGA Under Sections 237 & 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 and Section 72, Trustee Act 1956 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Mangatawa No 9B, No 3B, No 2B Block I WAENGA I A Between TE TIMATANGA NEIL TE KANI, TAIA HONIANA, PARAONE PIRIKA, TAHI AITKEN, CAINE RARORA TAIAPA, ANETA TE MIRIARANGI HEKE as trustees of MANGATAWA 9 B, NO 3 B, N...
...Committee. He chose not to make any substantive submissions on penalty, but merely to set out what he sought from the process. [103] The submissions process followed by the Committee was proper. It complied with the requirements of natural justice. [104] We also agree with the penalty imposed by the Committee for the same reasons as the Committee. Mr Boswell’s breach of r 6.4 was unintentional low-level offending. He has no disciplinary record. There is no evidence of los...
...detail of our activity during the 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 reporting year. WORK OF THE COMMITTEE We place great importance on facilitating open dialogue with and obtaining feedback from abortion service providers in order to address any matters pivotal to improving the access to and timely provision of services. We note the continued improvement in the timeliness of first trimester abortions, which is further addressed below under the heading ‘Access to Services’....
...instructions and breaching Bayleys’ franchise protocols, they endeavoured to make amends in a generous and sensible way. No loss has arisen out of this situation at a time when the market was difficult for vendors. [39] In terms of the overall justice of this particular situation, we do not think that the conduct of the licensee second respondent is particularly concerning. However, on a 10 wider note, we are concerned that franchisees can, in good faith, be in breach of...
...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omission...
...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter.
...Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law Office accepts any liability for any errors or omission...