Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 123 Henderson v Nelson Marlborough District Health Board [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...as “this matter” and to take steps “… to identify any actions that can be taken to assist your return to work on the 29 th of September”. [35] This invitation was declined on Dr Henderson’s behalf by her lawyer, Ms Sharma. Matters did not rest there. On 19 September 2014, Mr Fleming wrote to Ms Sharma pointing out that a medical certificate certifying unfitness for work did not mean Dr Henderson was unfit to meet and stating his desire to have a meeting. A me...

2. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Morahan [2017] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 531 KB]

   ...respondent in respect of relevant transactions. 4 [11] Counsel for the applicant emphasised that Charge 1 made it clear that it covers only conduct occurring after 1 August 2002 and that the “particulars of the charge” being the “facts and matters relied on” to prove the charge are distinct from the charge itself, (Form A of the Schedule to the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Regulations 2008). [12] He accepted that the charge can only be proven...

3. LCRO 170/2019 ZY v LN QC (23 April 2021) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...appellants were to pay 75 per cent of the costs of upgrading the road to the standard required to accommodate use by heavy trucks. [10] In January 2018, Ms ZY’s solicitor Ms TW recommended that Mr LN be instructed to provide advice as to how matters could be progressed. At this point, there was uncertainty as to whether Ms ZY was able to recover the costs she had been awarded in the High Court, in view of the fact that the success she had achieved in that jurisdiction had been...

4. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Hay [2018] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...to recover her funds, were also important features of the Standards Committee’s case. [7] Mr Hay declared in bankruptcy, and his dealings with the Official Assignee were also the subject of evidence, relevant to credibility. As an ancillary matter, and also 1 Namely conduct caught by s 7(1)(a)(i) or s 7(1)(a)(ii) Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (LCA). The charge was amended on 4 August 2017. 2 Conduct caught by s 7(1)(b)(ii) LCA. 3 Se...

5. AMLCFT Statutory Review Consultation Document [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   - Review of the AML/CFT Act Consultation Document Ministry of Justice October 2021 Important notice The opinions contained in this document are those of the Ministry of Justice and do not reflect official government policy. Readers are advised to seek specific legal advice from a qualified professional person before undertaking any action in reliance on the contents of this publication. The contents of this discussion document must not be con...

6. Juror Satisfaction Survey 2023 Results Report [pdf, 539 KB]

   ...carried out annually in all New Zealand high courts and district courts that conduct jury trials, since 2008. The primary purpose of the survey is to understand how satisfied jurors are with the services and facilities provided by the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) in court. The survey was suspended in 2022 and replaced with a specialised survey that aimed to explore the juror experience under the Covid-19 response and protocols. The 2022 Covid-19 survey had an overall satisfact...

7. Budget 2024 Full-List-of-Fee-Changes.pdf [pdf, 369 KB]

   Ministry of Justice fee changes List of fee changes for Courts, Tribunals, Collection Services and Criminal Records Checks. New fees will take effect from 1 July 2024 unless stated otherwise. V3 Contents Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Court fees ...

8. Matthews v Matthews - Estate of Graham Ngahina Matthews [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 512 (2015 APPEAL 512) [pdf, 272 KB]

   2015 Maori Appellate Court MB 512 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20140010464 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Māori Land Court made on 2 August 2010 at 253 Aotea MB 250-274 and confirmed on 6 August 2014 at 323 Aotea MB 191-192 in respect of the Māori land interests of Graham Ngahina Matthews BETWEEN DUNCAN MATUTAERA MATTHEWS Appellant AND

9. [2015] NZEmpC 92 Hally Labels Ltd v Powell [pdf, 426 KB]

   HALLY LABELS LIMITED v KEVIN POWELL NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 92 [16 June 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 92 ARC 35/11 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN HALLY LABELS LIMITED Plaintiff AND KEVIN POWELL Defendant Hearing: 31 March-4 April 2014 2-12 February 2015 23-24 February 2015 Appearances: C T Patterson and A Halloran, counsel for plainti

10. Te Rununga o Ngati Hine - Determination of dispute between Te Rununga o Ngati Hine and Te Rununga a Iwi o Ngapuhi (2011) 28 Taitokerau MB 217 (28 TTK 217) [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...which are not the subject of a challenge to jurisdiction. That is, there is no dispute that Ngati Hine has a right to withdraw from TRAION and that this Court has a role in relation to any dispute that properly comes within the 2004 Act. Those matters will be dealt with in due course in accordance with the provisions of the 1993 and 2004 Acts. [9] I have been greatly assisted by counsel’s focussed and concise submissions. The application [10] The application was amended on 16...