Search Results

Search results for justice matters.

8497 items matching your search terms

  1. COVID-19 (Vaccinations) Legislation Bill [pdf, 247 KB]

    ...who are authorised persons.9 The Minister may also make orders to require affected workers for specified work to undergo medical examination, and/or impose certain other duties or requirements. Under s 11AA the Minister must be satisfied of certain matters before making an order, including that the order does not limit or is a justified limit on the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. 16. Clause 13 of the Bill introduces new s 33AA, which sets out the power to make...

  2. Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited v Te Rūnanga nui o te Aupōuri - application under s 182(4) Māori Fisheries Act 2004 (2015) 102 Taitokerau MB 1 (102 TTK 1) [pdf, 314 KB]

    102 Taitokerau MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130008950 UNDER Section 26C, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application by Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited for reference of Māori fisheries dispute between Te Rūnanga Nui o Te Aupōuri and Ngāti Kuri, Ngāi Takoto and Te Rarawa - referred under s 182(4), Māori Fisheries Act 2004 BETWEEN TE OHU KAIMOANA TRUSTEE LIMITED Applicant AND...

  3. Ngāti Pāoa Whānau Trust v Hauraki Māori Trust Board (1995) 96A Hauraki MB 155 (96A H 155) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...most appropriate representatives of any class or group of Maori affected by thoseproceedings; and (b) At the request of the ChiefExecutive or the ChiefJUdge. determine, in relation to any negotiations. consultations, allocation of funding. or other matter, the persons who, for the purposes of the negotiations, consultations. allocation, or other matter. are the most appropriate representatives of any class or group of Maori affected by the negotiations. consultations, allocation. or othermatte...

  4. [2022] NZEmpC 192 E Tū Inc v Rasier Operations BV [pdf, 483 KB]

    ...person under a contract of service, the court or the Authority (as the case may be) must determine the real nature of the relationship between them. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), the court or the Authority— (a) must consider all relevant matters, including any matters that indicate the intention of the persons; and (b) is not to treat as a determining matter any statement by the persons that describes the nature of their relationship. (4) Subsections (2) and (3) do not l...

  5. Deloitte report: Assessment of business compliance costs of the indicative anti-money laundering regulatory requirements [pdf, 2 MB]

    Ministry of Justice New Zealand: Assessment of business compliance costs of the indicative anti- money laundering regulatory requirements July 2008 This report has been prepared on the basis of limitation set out on page 4. New Zealand Assessment of Business Compliance Costs of the Indicative Anti-Money Laundering Regulatory Requirements Contents Executive Summary...............................................................................

  6. [2024] NZEmpC 125 Cronin-Lampe v Minister of Education [pdf, 607 KB]

    ...circumstances existed for time limitation purposes. In addition, MHS’s affirmative defence in respect of the ACC statutory bar led to an important judgment in the Supreme Court,22 and required consideration in this Court’s second judgment.23 These matters were not straightforward. (d) The case was far larger than the vast majority of cases heard by the Employment Court. Significant attendances by several lawyers were required to: (i) assist 19 witnesses with the preparati...

  7. Stanimirovic v Levarko [2018] NZIACDT 3 (7 February 2018) [pdf, 350 KB]

    ...contacted him and identified that Mr Levarko’s licence was being used by the Canadian entities, Mr Levarko says he was helpful. However, Mr Stanimirovic was not a client and Mr Levarko properly discharged his duties to Mr Stanimirovic by discussing matters with him and suggesting that the entities in Canada should deal with his concerns. [7] The complaint focuses solely on the circumstances relating to Mr Stanimirovic. However, it is necessary to consider the structure and arran...

  8. [2012] NZEmpC 86 Lend Lease Infrastructure Services (NZ) Ltd v Recreational Services Ltd [pdf, 147 KB]

    LEND LEASE INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED V RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 86 [1 June 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 86 ARC 31/12 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LEND LEASE INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff AND RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 May 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Anthony Drake and Rosem...

  9. [2013] NZEmpC 85 Aarts v Barnados New Zealand [pdf, 328 KB]

    JOHAN AARTS V BARNARDOS NEW ZEALAND NZEmpC AK [2013] NZEmpC 85 [20 May 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 85 ARC 14/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHAN AARTS Plaintiff AND BARNARDOS NEW ZEALAND First Defendant AND COMMISSIONER OF NEW ZEALAND POLICE Second Defendant AND MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT Third Defendant AND THE PRIVACY COMMISSIONER Fourt