8497 items matching your search terms
EMMA GYENGE V CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEMPC 1 [10 January 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEMPC 1 ARC 65/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN EMMA GYENGE Plaintiff AND CLIFFORD LAMAR LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 November 2010 11 November 2010 22 November 2010 Appearances: Jan Gyenge, Agent for Plaintiff Clifford Harris, Agent for Defendant Ju
PAUL HINES v EASTLAND PORT LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 79 [16 July 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 79 EMPC 14/2018 EMPC 47/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PAUL HINES Plaintiff AND EASTLAND PORT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 March, 4 April, 9-13 April and 24 April 2018 (heard at Auckland, Wellington and Gisborne) Appearances:
191 Taitokerau MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT UNDER Sections 67, 236, 237, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Omapere Taraire E & Rangihamama X3A Ahu Whenua Trust BETWEEN A20180002924 RACHEL WITANA and TAOKO WIHONGI Applicants AND RANIERA SONNY TAU, TE TUHI ROBUST, BRUCE CUTFORTH and COLLEEN BERMINGHAM-BROWN Respondents A20180002884 AND BETW...
HARRIS V CHARTER TRUCKS LTD CHCH CC 16/07 11 September 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH CC 16/07 CRC 8/06 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RUSSELL WAYNE RICHARD HARRIS Plaintiff AND CHARTER TRUCKS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 2 October 2006 (Heard at Christchurch) Appearances: D G Beck, counsel for plaintiff P M James, counsel for defendant Judgment: 11 September 2007 JUDG...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 34 READT 002/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN TERESA and BRIAN HAMMOND Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 520) First Respondent AND SONIA TAFILIPEPE Second Respondent Hearing: 23 July 2020, at Christchurch Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr G Denley, Mem...
IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIIUTO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT Hearing: 134 W AIIU TO MB 3 A20060026843 A20060002649 IN THE MATTER OF Hauturu East 8 Block AND An application for review oftrust UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 AND UNDER RUAPUHA UEKAHA HAPU TRUST Applicant An application for enforcement of obligations of trust and review of trust Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 NORMANTANE Applicant 16 October 2007, 127 Waikato MB 259-3...
...suitability of different foundation designs, which had to take into account the geotechnical nature of the ground conditions and the existing construction of the house. 17 I have also seen a joint expert’s report, where the experts disagreed on all matters of significance in respect of what was required for remediation. [11] The applicants dispute that the foundation design and cost was the core issue. They say that their claim was for the cost of rebuilding the house, not repai...
...with Ms CL (a) having signed the purchase agreement without the building report condition; 7 (b) knowing about “potential issues with flooding or drainage from the road”; (c) assuming “responsibility” for council enquiries about those matters; and (d) concerning insurance of the property, having obtained “appropriate” advice from Mr BK, then making her own insurance arrangements and instructing Mr BK on 24 September 2013 the insurance condition had been satisfied.
GWILT V BRIGGS & STRATTON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 140 [27 October 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 140 ARC 7/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN GEOFFREY SCHOLEFIELD GWILT Plaintiff AND BRIGGS & STRATTON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26-29 July and 10 August 2010 (5 days) (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Garry Pollak, cou
...This appears to have occurred shortly before the first ‘final’ inspection on 17 January 2003 as Mr Dekker booked the previous inspection in November 2002. [10] No weathertightness issues were identified at this inspection. Six minor matters were required to be attended to before the CCC Page | 5 was issued. These included the installation of a top rail to the deck balustrades. [11] In November 2003 the Council received information from the Weathertight Homes...