8490 items matching your search terms
T E U R E W E R A P A R T I I I Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 2 W A I 8 9 4 T E U R E W E R A P r e - p u b l i c a t i o n P a r t I I I From self-governing native res
1 PORIRUA KI MANAWATŪ INQUIRY: HISTORICAL ISSUES SCOPING REPORT FOR HAPŪ AND IWI BROADLY ASSOCIATED WITH NGĀTI RAUKAWA Dr Robyn Anderson 9 December 2014 Wai 2200, #A128 MEMATUI Official MEMATUI Received MEMATUI Text Box 29 Jan 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Researcher introduction ..........................................................................................
ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz MARCH | POUTÜ-TE-RANGI 2022 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confirmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact your local Mäori Land Court office.
...jurisdiction. 4.7.8 When this matter was transferred from the District Court, it was as a result of an interlocutory application by the Owners. The application was opposed by Bay Building Certifiers on the grounds that it was not in the interests of justice (as distinct from economics) that such a transfer should be made. It was never suggested by any party to Judge Rollo that the WHRS adjudicator would not have jurisdiction to determine all matters raised in the proceedings....
...immediate relationship to the original purpose that is, Mr Deeming wanted some form of investigation. It was therefore entirely appropriate for the Mayor to have delegated that task to the local representative, being Councillor Shelley Deeming. As a matter of natural justice, if a complaint is received it is entirely appropriate the entity complained about is provided with a copy. [47] In our view both submissions in relation to Principle 11(a) proceed on a misreading of both the lette...
...Courts of superior jurisdiction, and in particular I refer to a decision of the New Zealand Court of Appeal in T v M [1984] 2 NZFLR 462. It is interesting to note that the principal Judgment is delivered by the then president of the Court of Appeal, Justice Woodhouse, who was, of course, the architect of Accident Compensation in New Zealand. In that decision His Honour stated, inter alia, as follows: For myself I would say at once that the provision for questions of fact to be “...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision [2017] NZEnvC 31- ENV-2016-WLG-000038 of an application for declarations under sections 310 and 311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 WELLINGTON FISH AND GAME COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INC Applicants MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge C J Thompson Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Environment Commissioner J R Mills Hearing: at Wellington 13 -
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 070 Ref: LCRO 11/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GD and CZ Applicants AND BO Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr GD (f
T A U R A N G A M O A N A 1 8 8 6 – 2 0 0 6 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G
...wolJki rem"ill a~ceptable lor a southern extension on 20 MalCh 2015. TIle New Zealand AI~IM Pilots Association (NZALPA) Judlc,ally reviewed the Diredor's decision to the High Court. In her juagment, delwerod 011 6 July 2016. her HOIiOUr Justice Clark dismissed NZALPA's concerns, and held lIlal the Director's d&GJsion and tl18 process IGading to Ihal decision was lawful. On 2B July 2018, NZALPA appeoled Ihe High Court Deoision to the Court of Appeal. I~ lheir judg...