Search Results

1. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) [pdf, 720 KB]

   ...provide an undertaking. A further joint memorandum was then filed by counsel on 15 August 2018 with a list of interrogatories and documents for production by the trustees. [10] On 6 September 2018, I issued a decision addressing several preliminary matters, including timetabling, discovery and the grant of the injunction.7 I confirmed the proposed timetable and directed the trustees to advise the Court regarding the instruction of counsel and to answer the interrogatories posed, n...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 155 Save the Maitai Inc v Nelson City Council [pdf, 888 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 155 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act and Private Plan Change 28 to the Nelson Resource Management Plan BETWEEN SAVE THE MAITAI INCORPORATED (ENV-2022-CHC-65) Appellant AND NELSON CITY COUNCIL Respondent AND CCKV MAITAI DEV CO LP and BAYVIEW NELSON LIMITED Applicant Court: E

3. Brunton v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2023] NZACC 187 [pdf, 382 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 187 ACR 233/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JULIE BRUNTON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 8 May 2023 Heard at: Auckland Appearances: J Brunton, appellant in person (by AVL, audio only as video unavailable) I Hunt for respondent Judgment: 17 Novem

4. Taukamo v ACC [2014] NZACA 12 [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...before and after the application was made, inadequate reasons for the delay, prejudice to ACC because of the retrospective assessments and the lack of merit in Ms Taukamo’s claim given the expert evidence. This also affected the overall interests of justice, which did not favour an extension of time. [10] Mr Allen, speaking to Mr Appleby’s submissions, relied on Mr Praat’s claimed reservation of the right to appeal as contained in his letter of 11 May 2000, and attributed respon...

5. CBA v LKJ Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...3 sought by the parties, it will be seen that at the conclusion of this decision leave has been reserved for them to apply. [8] The reasons for the final non-publication orders follow. [9] The granting of name suppression is a discretionary matter for a court or tribunal: R v Liddell [1995] 1 NZLR 538 (CA). The starting point when considering suppression orders is the presumption of open judicial proceedings, freedom of speech (as allowed by s 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights...

6. ENVC Matiatia transcript notice of motion 20150326 [pdf, 478 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2013-AKL-000174 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal pursuant to s87 of Resource Management Act 1991 BY WAIHEKE MARINAS LIMITED Applicant Notice of Motion by Direction Matiatia Inc. seeking order that amended application is “out of scope” Hearing Commenced: 26 March 2015 Court: Judge L Newhook Commissioner A Leijnen Commissioner R Howie Appearances: Mr R Brabant and Mr J Brabant for the Appel

7. Cooper v Wellington City Council [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...conference set down the procedures for the adjudication process and timetabling. 1.7 There were 20 Procedural Orders issued during the interlocutory proceedings which dealt with applications for removal and joinder of parties, timetabling matters and the like. 1.8 The Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Respondents were removed from the adjudication proceedings during the interlocutory period. 3 Claim 2171:Determination 1.9 Mediation was attempted during the period of the...

8. Wihelmus Hooft van Huijsduijnen v Woodley [2012] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 451 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000028 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 11 BETWEEN RONALD ALOYSIUS WIHELMUS AND MARTINA HELENA MARIA HOOFT VAN HUIJSDUIJNEN Claimants AND EDWARD MERVYN JOHN AND LYNETTE ANNE CATHERINE WOODLEY First Respondents AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND ALAN GORDON MINTY (Removed) Third Respondent AND SAWREY CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND DONALD JOHN HAWINKELS Fifth Respo

9. Hemi v Ritchie - Whaanga 1D1D Roadway (2025) 282 Waikato Maniapoto MB 9 (282 WMN 9) [pdf, 745 KB]

   ...AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO MANIAPOTO In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waikato Maniapoto District AP-20230000020537 WĀHANGA Under Sections 18(b), 19(1)(a), (b) and (c) Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Whaanga 1D1D Roadway I WAENGA I A Between HOHUA HEMI AS TRUSTEE OF THE HEMI WHANAU TRUST Te Kaitono Applicant ME And DR HELEN RITCHIE AS A TRUSTEE OF THE RITCHIE FAMILY TRUST Te Kaiurupare Tua...

10. Pilbrow & Anor as Trustees of the Pilbrow Family Trust v Moorhead [2011] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 352 KB]

    Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000059 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 31 BETWEEN OWEN IVOR MAUL PILBROW and JOAN GWENDOLINE PILBROW as Trustees of the PILBROW FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND HUGH CHARLES MOORHEAD and BARBARA MARY MOORHEAD First Respondents AND CRAVEN BUILDERS LIMITED Second Respondent AND EUROPLAST FINISHES LIMITED Third Respondent AND LANCE CLARK Fourth Respondent AND DAVID TAYLOR Fifth Respondent AND GIANNI MA