6763 items matching your search terms
LAURA JANE GEORGE v AUCKLAND COUNCIL NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 179 [27 September 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 179 ARC 91/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed by special leave BETWEEN LAURA JANE GEORGE Plaintiff AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Defendant ARC 124/10 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed BETWEEN AUCKLAND COUNCIL Plaintiff AND LAURA JANE GEORGE Defendant Hearin
CLAIM FILE NO: 00765 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN NICOLE ODETTE MILLER-HARD Claimant AND MELANIE GAIL STEWART First Respondent AND ROBIN LAWRENCE FORD Second Respondent AND BAY BUILDING CERTIFIERS LIMITED Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, the TAURANGA DISTRICT COUNCIL having been struck out. AND No Fifth Respondent, GEOFFREY MORRISON having been struck out
...(emphasis added) 5.10 The definition of "owner" in the WHRS Act includes a shareholder of a company, the principal purpose of which is to own the dwellinghouse or the dwellinghouses within the building concerned. That gives clear legislative indication that the Act is intended to look beyond the strict legality of ownership and to allow a claim where strict ownership is vested in another party (a company). 5.11 In Berry v Lay & Ors (WHRS claim 136 – 11/3/05)...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC '-05 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act AHUAREKA TRUSTEES (NO. 2) LTD (ENV-2015-AKL-147) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge B P Dwyer Environment Commissioner J R Mills Environment Commissioner Evon Dadelszen Hearing: 27 June - 5 July 2017 Final submissions: 19 July 2017 Appearances: R E Bartlett QC for
...panels are really driven by the personalities of the people. Without a code of practice and training and protocols and that stuff, it relies on magic. When that magic person goes, it goes to custard.’5 Another member suggested managing risks by legislating for the panels. The evaluators support this idea. The early lack of clarity about the scope and criteria of iwi panels led to some initial tensions between Police and providers. For example, in some instances panels heard...
...witnesses agree are the relevant objectives and policies of the operative and proposed regional policy statements and district plans.9 5 6 7 8 9 Section 290(1) RMA. Sections 290(2) and 290A RMA. That is the version as amended by the Resource Legislation Amendment Act 2017 (2017 No. 15), as the application was notified on 7 February 2018 and decided on 1 June 2018. Section 104B, RMA. There are no national policy statements relevantly bearing on our determination of the appea...
...ground that since Dr Cossens' application was lodged before 18 October 2017 the applicable version of the RMA is the statute up to and inclusive of the Resource Management Amendment Act 2013. In particular the changes made by the Resource Legislation Amendment Act 2017 do not apply. [32J The site is within the Rural General Zone of the Queenstown Lakes Operative District Plan ("the ODP"). The witnesses agree that the site is part of a Visual Amenity Landscape ("V...
...familiar with. She speaks from a place of considerable knowledge, having worked across the victims sector as a researcher, advocate and therapist. As Chief Victims Advisor, she’s responsible for providing the Government with independent advice on legislative, policy and other issues relating to victims of crime. The role was set up as part of a wider set of Government-led changes to address family and sexual violence and to help make communities safer. Kim says one of the mos...
...traffic offences which were previously heard in the District Court are now heard in the Youth Court. Note that this data shows charges finalised by 30 June 2020; it does not include charges that were still active in court. Therefore, the full impact of the legislation change may not be observed until 2021. The Youth Court is closed to the public, so any details that may identify an individual child or young person cannot be reported. A modified version of Statistics NZ's method of base 3...
LCRO 75/2017 210/2017 212/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SW Applicant and Respondent AND HB Respondent and Applicant The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms SW and Ms HB, both of whom are lawyers, applied for